Posted on 09/03/2018 11:44:38 AM PDT by SMGFan
Two long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen were brought to a well publicized charge, just ahead of the Mid-Terms, by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department. Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time. Good job Jeff...…
2:25 PM - 3 Sep 2018
....The Democrats, none of whom voted for Jeff Sessions, must love him now. Same thing with Lyin’ James Comey. The Dems all hated him, wanted him out, thought he was disgusting - UNTIL I FIRED HIM! Immediately he became a wonderful man, a saint like figure in fact. Really sick!
2:39 PM - 3 Sep 2018
IdlibDawn?
There are upwards of 70,000 to 100,000 armed Jihadists/Alqueda in Idlib,.... which borders Turkey.....so the battle there will be the largest in the Syrian war.
Erdogan has largely supplied the Jihadists with hopes he ultimately would control the area....it hasn’t worked.
Maybe its raining........
So if he fires Magoo they can say it’s because “AG Sessions put the law above party by investigating 2 GOP Congressmen who would have been re-elected easily”. Jeff thinks Trump would not dare fire him just when the Kavanaugh confirmation is beginning. I can’t wait to see the treasonous POS kicked out of the building.
Q is nonsense.
Yes he can. The problem is what to do next. Anyone he nominates to replace Sessions will have to be confirmed by the Senate. They mostly hate Trump and feel loyalty to their former, and most likely future, fellow senator. If Trump fires Sessions the Senate might take the opportunity to publicly embarrass him by declining his replacement nominee. They will certainly make a public spectacle out of the confirmation process. So, Trump has to bide his time and wait for the right opportunity to fire him.
Yet another reason for the Democrats to thank Jeff Sessions.
You are nonsense.
Guessing the other is Duncan D Hunter in CA
Well you know me as well as you know Q.
Trust the Williams.
Right. Recent history folks. The Senate Republicans said they would not approve a replacement. It sounds like they are loosening up for after the midterms.
> “Well you know me as well as you know Q”
Yeah, anyone can see you have done ZERO research and therefore have nothing worthwhile to contribute.
> “Trust the Williams.”
No fricken way!
When did this change take place? POTUS has been pounding Sessions for months, and I just searched Qanon.pub for Sessions, and Q was defending him just the other day.
So, who are you to say what and when it changed, unless it is all in your head. That's my vote, because the answer would be, Q is fake news trash. And by the way, POTUS said the other day to not trust any anonymous sources. Yet that's all Q is. 8chan, “anons”, “Qanon” is all anonymous. Time to wake up and get back on the Trump MAGA train, and leave the conspiracy bs behind.
Poor analysis. No more than insistent, fantastical self indulgence and a lot less.
No worries, though. Accuse me of being unenlightened and you’ll keep your high.
I mean really perhaps you have a bit of an obsession. Ive read articles explaining why Q is valid. They were pure bs. Sorry.
Q is a litmus test for stupidity
Trust the Williams
When satire and stupidity breed Q is born.
“Q was reflecting POTUS’s view at the time.
POTUS was saying in effect “TRUST SESSIONS FOR NOW”.
But now that Sessions has shown his cowardice, incompetence, or bias, the new view is:
“TRUST SESSIONS NO MORE”.”
That’s even more idiotic than usual. “Trust Sessions” was Q saying “I know what’s going on behind the scenes. Sessions is going to indict eleventy-million people, Huber is on it, blah blah blah.” It was BS, we knew it, Qooks went along, like lemmings following a phoney pied piper. You fell for it, parroted it, named threads after it, and were duped.
Trump hasn’t changed. Q has, you have, trying to maintain some sort of creibility. And. You. Have None. Zero. Zip. Bupkiss.
“Trust The Williams!”
I’ll buy that. “Follow the Shoe!” is already taken. (Monty Python, “Life of Brian”)
Q POST #2029, August 31, 2018
>>2817197 Think [WAPO] Qanon yesterday (poll) POTUS today (poll) Notice any similarities? FAKE NEWS readers (asleep: not attentive or alert; inactive) told to SUPPORT SESSIONS? "Every battle is won before it's ever fought." Are you awake? QThe above Q Post does not support Sessions, it calls out that fake news readers are being told to support Sessions.
Q no longer posts to "TRUST SESSIONS". Q makes links and comments concerning Sessions in the news but does not directly post to trust Sessions. The last time Q posted directly to "TRUST SESSIONS" was April 10 this year.
POTUS's tweets were not 'pounding' Sessions for months. POTUS's tweet attacks on Sessions increased around the time of his interview with Fox's Ainsley Earhardt, mid-August only a few weeks ago. Before that he commented he was frustrated that Sessions had recused himself and I posted that to FR. But his direction was to allow Sessions time to see what he could do which coincided with Q posting "TRUST SESSIONS".
It's obvious POTUS has changed his mind about Sessions. It's obvious Q is reflecting POTUS's thoughts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.