Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Karl Rove Rips Into Trump For Considering DOJ Probe Of Hillary Clinton
The Daily Caller ^ | 08/31/2018 | Nick Givas |

Posted on 08/31/2018 12:07:32 PM PDT by detective

Republican strategist Karl Rove ripped into President Donald Trump on “America’s Newsroom” Friday for considering a Justice Department investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“I think it’s unwise for any president of any party to look like he is demanding that the Justice Department investigate his political opponents,” Rove said.

“It is just unseemly. I think a good test of this is turnabout. What if Hillary Clinton had won the election? Would we be excited about Hillary Clinton calling upon her attorney general to investigate Donald Trump over the meeting at the Trump Tower?”

Rove said that’s not the way “we do things” in America and advised Trump to stop talking about a possible Clinton investigation altogether.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; karlrove; mediawingofthednc; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; rove; smearmachine; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: Shethink13
“I think it’s unwise for any president of any party to look like he is demanding that the Justice Department investigate his political opponents,” Rove said.
Political opponents? Would someone please tell Rove the election is over?
That’s the thing - the Democrats do not accept that any election is truly over until it has been decided in their favor.

I sure hope Trump is able to crack the “Melanin Wall” and thereby cripple the Democrats for the rest of my lifetime. A party which can nominate Barak and Hillary can no longer be trusted with any shot at the presidency.


121 posted on 08/31/2018 1:41:47 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Journalism promotes itself - and promotes big government - by speaking ill of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: detective

Rove must be living on Mars, since he has not seen what has been occurring in America.

They tried to frame a President for treason, and he said nothing because he hates Trump.

They lied to federal judges, they lied to FISA Courts, they lied to get wiretaps, they lied to put people in jail, they lied to spy on innocent Americans, they lied so that newspapers would lie, they lied about people’s guilt, they lied to arrest people’s lawyers, they lied to destroy attorney-client privilege, they lied to get others to lie, and why did they do all this lying, for one reason, they didn’t like Donald Trump’s politics.

Rove is a fool for thinking us this stupid and naive. We have witnessed the greatest weaponization and politicization of the Department of Justice in the history of America. The vulgar impunity which Obama used the law enforcement arm to destroy his political enemies and not so much as a word of admonishment in the press. Silence means they are complicit. While we all watched Hillary sell her office to the highest bidder, and protect their pay for play schemes by jeopardizing the nation with her own file server. No charges! No punishment for grotesque actions of almost treasonous negligence. Rove is a treacherous liar. He calls evil good, and when Trump wants to demand justice for everyone - he then says Trump is the one playing politics.

It is blindness like this that got Trump elected.

The blindness is still occurring.

They treat the nation like fools.

They wonder why they are despised.


122 posted on 08/31/2018 1:48:10 PM PDT by Titus-Maximus (The trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

The flak is heaviest directly above the target.


123 posted on 08/31/2018 1:48:57 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Karl Rove: Why Hillary’s email problem is not going away. Plus, Team Trump’s next move
By Karl Rove, Published July 06, 2016, Fox News

This is not over: Hillary Clinton may think the issue of her email server is over because no one was indicted, but it’s not. In a lengthy 2,314-word statement, FBI Director James Comey found Clinton guilty of lying in every major claim she made to the American people, but then he inexplicably failed to indict her. Clinton has said what she did was permitted or allowed, but Comey offered no support for her claim. He castigated her and her close aides for being “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

Clinton said she never sent or received classified information, but Comey found 110 emails contained information that was classified at the time they were sent through Clinton’s private server. Clinton “should have known that an unclassified system was no place” for those kind of messages, he said. As to the 2,000 emails that contained information that was subsequently classified, Comey said even if sensitive information is not marked “classified in an email,” Clinton and her staff should know better and were “still obligated to protect it.”

Clinton said her private server was not hacked, but Comey said “we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.” “Hostile actors gained access to the private commercial email accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account,” Comey said. “Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent,” and Clinton “used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries.”

Clinton said she turned over all her official emails after a careful review of all of them, but Comey said the FBI “discovered several thousand work-related emails” by searching the computers of State Department employees and others who corresponded with Clinton and her aides. Comey explained that Clinton’s lawyers “relied on header information and used search terms” and did not review each message, missing potentially thousands of official emails. In short, Hillary Clinton has lied about this from the beginning.

Most voters see Clinton as untrustworthy and dishonest. She and her husband appear to think the rules (or in this case, the laws) don’t apply to them. Both these problems got worse last week. It didn’t help that Bill Clinton barged onto Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s plane Monday while it was parked at a Phoenix airport and stayed 30 minutes. Like that didn’t look fishy!

And it wasn’t smart for Team Clinton to leak to the New York Times that Hillary is considering keeping Lynch on as AG if she wins the White House. Like that doesn’t seem like a payoff.

Stay on this channel or change? The question is whether these issues will occupy more of the public dialogue in the final week before the Republican National Convention. The answer to that lies in the hands of Team Trump. On Saturday The Donald tweeted, “it is impossible for the FBI not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton. What she did was wrong.” Twitter has lots of commendable features, but its 140-character brevity is a problem in this instance.

Team Trump is better off prosecuting this issue in detail, rather than jumping to the end of the argument. That is to say, Trump would be better off warming up the teleprompter and systematically working his way through what Clinton did and why it was wrong, and excoriating her for her recklessness with the nation’s secrets.

The Trump campaign (and the candidate) act like everyone knows as much as they do about this issue and there’s no need to methodically explore Clinton’s misrepresentations, evasions and lies. But many swing voters would welcome hearing the case litigated in depth.

Nor is this the only issue worth pursuing: Last week’s report by the House Select Committee on Benghazi reminded Americans that Secretary Clinton and a top deputy refused numerous requests from Ambassador Chris Stevens to increase security for the Libyan mission and that the Obama administration did not deploy any military assets during the 13-hour terrorist attack that cost four Americans their lives.

The report was another reminder to voters that Clinton lied, first to the nation and then to the parents of the four dead Americans, by claiming the attack was spontaneous, inspired by an anti-Muslim web video. She knew this was untrue, but with the U.S. presidential election less than two months away, she didn’t want to admit it was a terrorist attack.

Again, more detail is better than a sound bite, and staging matters. Just as Clinton was wise to go to Atlantic City this week to continue her attacks on Trump’s business record, Team Trump must be concerned about staging, backdrops and supportive voices.

Does he need the money or not? This week will also see whether the Trump campaign’s new expanded finance operation and the campaign’s belated use of internet fundraising solicitations increase the campaign’s fundraising. In May, Trump raised just over $3 million, while Clinton raised $26 million. At the start of June, her campaign had $42 million cash on hand; his had $1.3 million. The Trump campaign says money has been pouring in during the last week, much of it from email appeals signed by the candidate and his son, Eric.

Trump doesn’t help his fundraising requests by saying, as he did last Wednesday, “I don’t even know why I need so much money,” and explaining, “I go around. I make speeches. I don’t even need commercials.” The presumptive Republican nominee is betting that weeks of unanswered television ads in battleground states will either have no impact or can be offset by campaign speeches alone. He may be right, but he would be the first presidential candidate to win that dangerous bet.

He’d be better off admitting that while he may not need as much money as Clinton, he needs to have sufficient funds to mount a strong campaign, and that he’s willing to put in a significant amount of his own money and hopes people will match his largesse with their personal contributions. VEEP! Unless he plans to unveil his running mate at the convention itself, as George H.W. Bush did in 1992 with Sen. Dan Quayle, this is the week for Trump to announce his vice presidential pick. Then again, Hillary might steal The Donald’s spotlight by naming her pick late this week, too. Either way, both campaigns will spend a considerable amount of their time this week coming to their conclusions on this important decision.

================================

Karl Rove joined Fox News Channel as a political contributor in February 2008. He also currently serves as a columnist for the Wall Street Journal. Mr. Rove helped organize the political-action committee American Crossroads. His latest book is "The Triumph of William McKinley: Why the Election of 1896 Still Matters" (Simon & Schuster, 2015). Follow him on Twitter @KarlRove. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/07/06/karl-rove-why-hillary-s-email-problem-is-not-going-away-plus-team-trump-s-next-move.html

124 posted on 08/31/2018 1:50:56 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I have been ranting ehre for months. The evidence is in Comeys report to indict her. They should have imprisoned her and let her plead on the foundation and shot her for the uranium treason.


125 posted on 08/31/2018 1:53:46 PM PDT by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: detective

Rove is a fat tub of lard globalist...stay away from candles, Karl...oh, likely reason your name starts with K...commie...

Watch out for spontaneous human combustion.


126 posted on 08/31/2018 1:56:40 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (17...#1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Hey Rove; take your stupid white board and shove it up your ass!


127 posted on 08/31/2018 1:57:54 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

How do you know?
Have you peeked below the belt line?


128 posted on 08/31/2018 2:02:27 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: detective

Cuz it’s all right for an outgoing president to spy on opponents and to gin up phony justification for targeting opponents. What a putz.


129 posted on 08/31/2018 2:04:54 PM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Karl Rove should be investigated for getting $30 million for the 2012 elections and not winning a single race.


130 posted on 08/31/2018 2:06:00 PM PDT by Mozzafiato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
“Rove probably moonlights as a bartender at Chappaqua luncheons.” Rove is a major swamp creature in the swamp. In fact, he is of the most evil and dangerous species; a GOP Never Trumper🐍🐊🕷🦂....
131 posted on 08/31/2018 2:08:27 PM PDT by snoringbear (W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: detective

Trump is getting verrrry, verrrry close and the rats are sh*tting their drawers!


132 posted on 08/31/2018 2:12:27 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Boycott The NFL! Molon Labe! Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
“I think it’s unwise for any president of any party to look like he is demanding that the Justice Department investigate his political opponents,” Rove said...It's very wise when the political opponent has also by all available evidence been the center of a criminal cabal to thwart the will of the people by destroying the president they elected - Rove demonstrates the kind of stupidity that allows some to label as racist anyone who criticizes Obama - he's incapable of understanding that one individual can have many identities, some of which should be questioned and even prosecuted.....
133 posted on 08/31/2018 2:18:12 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

This is satire right?


134 posted on 08/31/2018 2:26:32 PM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Rove and his ilk have done enough damage to the country. I think Rove is largely responsible for the disaster W turned into. Rove should just STFU and sit down.


135 posted on 08/31/2018 2:32:17 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Did he have his dry erase board with him?


136 posted on 08/31/2018 2:34:22 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
It is just unseemly. I think a good test of this is turnabout. What if Hillary Clinton had won the election? Would we be excited about Hillary Clinton calling upon her attorney general to investigate Donald Trump over the meeting at the Trump Tower?”

In a rational free country, true justice is gathering relevant appropriate information about someone, then making a moral judgment about them, then giving them what they deserve.

137 posted on 08/31/2018 2:34:48 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

When I heard Rove say ‘what if Hillary Clinton had won....and calling upon her AG to investigate Trump...’

I thought, and what do you think IS happening??? She didn’t win, yet her and her Dem cronies are instigating the many, ridiculous investigations on Pres Trump and his associates.


138 posted on 08/31/2018 2:38:08 PM PDT by 4integrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Liz; GOPJ
Sounds like Rove wanted to talk about going after Hillary as long as nobody would actually do it.

The current Rove article says I think it’s unwise for any president of any party to look like he is demanding that the Justice Department investigate his political opponents.

But it's OK for Obama and Hillary to corrupt the DOJ to go after Trump as long as they they don't "look like" they are doing it.

139 posted on 08/31/2018 2:38:53 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: detective

I didn’t hear Hillary talking about investigating Trump during the campaign, because there was nothing to investigate until SHE created “charges”. Trump, on the other hand, promised the American voters that he WOULD investigate Hillary and Lock Her Up! Of course, you had to have actually watched his rallys to know that, and I’m sure the “King Maker” Karl Rove never stooped to do that.


140 posted on 08/31/2018 2:44:44 PM PDT by georgiegirl (Count me Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson