Posted on 08/28/2018 6:46:14 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The only news network that may report it is OAN.
According to Gohmert, McCulloch sent his ICIG investigator Frank Rucker to present the findings to Strzok who knew he met with him. Conveniently, Strzok couldn’t remember what they talked about.
When Rucker spoke with Strzok, he nodded but was remarkably uninterested, Gohmert said.
—— Strzok Ignored Evidence That Hillary’s Emails Were Sent to a Foreign Entity (IG Horowitz Too)
Independent Sentinel ^ | July 14, 2018 | S. Noble http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3670861/posts
Strzok
Maybe because of the ongoing trade and NK negotiations.
Hillary’s server was just a high-tech dead-drop, a modern version of Alger Hiss’ hollowed out pumpkin. She has done far more damage than did the Rosenbergs and deserves at least as harsh a sentence.
And/or the name of the country was redacted from Gohmert’s copy of the information until now.
Exactly my thoughts, except the article does state later that the FBI did refer the case to DOJ in 2015 and ALSO informed Sally Yates, who probably tamped down the DOJ.
Whatever. #LOCKHERUP
Yoga yoga yoga...
Is it “hacking” if she gave China the address and password for money?
Unlike the FBI, you can bet China looked at every message.
Strzok was only one of the people responsible - three other top FBI officials were notified.
It may be that one or more of those passed it on to the DOJ in 2015. Question is, who besides Strzok did not... or was he the only one who did not act on it?
Considering how Bill and Hillary sold their souls and our future to Communist China during the 90’s, I doubt they had to hack very hard.
You would have to be a completely arrogant but ridiculously naive buffoon to think that you could run your own email server more securely than the state department and the government IT and security professionals would, and why would you want to anyway? You take all the liability for security problems onto yourself instead of the officials in charge of state security.
Oh wait... hrmmm.... So why would you want to avoid state provided security? hmmmmm
Okay okay, let’s just skip the whole question of intent, even though it’s blatantly obvious that someone wanted to hide their activities from oversignt (among other things) which should get you fired (if not jailed) all by itself... and let’s just ask the question that I personally think is more relevant. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK YOU ARE QUALIFIED TO RUN THE GREATEST NATION IN THE WORLD IF YOU ACTUALLY THINK YOU CAN HIDE YOUR EMAILS FROM FOREIGN STATE ACTORS LET ALONE YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT????
But, but but Muh-Russia...
Did You Know:
In 2014 the DOJ indicted 5 Chinese military officers for hacking the US OPM database and stealing 22 million records
Those officers never once appeared in a US courtroom
Obama held a summit with Xi the next year
The Chinese never stopped their cyberattacks
Jack Posobiec
@JackPosobiec
8:47 PM - 27 Aug 2018
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1034286385107095553
C’mon - how much more does this Justice Dept need?
There are about two dozen at least that can and should be doing hard time now, just on what we all know to be true already. This is more important than tax cuts or tariffs or building a wall.
America can’t be great and a Banana republic at the same time.
Forget the mid terms, don’t worry about ‘the independents’, just get ‘er done!
piasa wrote:
“And it was China that rolled up our entire human asset network in the country and executed them.”
This happened —after— the server was hacked, correct?
Was there info on the server about those human assets ?
If so, then illary is guilty of treason & espionage.
Lock.
Her.
Up!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.