Posted on 08/27/2018 10:19:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
Department of Justice prosecutors have a handful of vague laws they turn to when they want to take down a Republican politician. The laws sound like serious offenses to the average person, but are much more innocuous. For example, mail and wire fraud merely means someone used the mail or wire communications to send communications that were related to an alleged crime of trying to deprive someone from money or property. It’s really just piling on. Another one is false statements. That’s a charge prosecutors turn to when they are having no luck showing the validity of the main charges.
When DOJ prosecutors couldn’t come up with an election crime involving Russians related to two men affiliated with Trump, they cajoled the two into pleading guilty to false statements. Former Trump National Security Advisor Mike Flynn and Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI about their contacts with Russians. Both realized they could end up with years in prison if prosecutors tried them for the typical round of vague crimes. However, Papadopoulos may be changing his mind. Figuring out he got a raw deal, he is now considering withdrawing his guilty plea.
Crimes involving campaign contribution fraud are also common for prosecutors to bring when they want to get someone. I’m a former county elections attorney, and usually when there is something amiss with candidate filings, the candidate is offered the chance to amend their forms, and may be ordered to pay a fine. It’s a civil process, not criminal. It’s rare that such violations result in criminal charges. This was doneto popular conservative filmmaker and author Dinesh D’Souza. He was sentenced to eight months in a halfway house, five years probation and a $30,000 fine for campaign contribution issues under the Obama administration.
A recent victim of DOJ targeting is former Congressman Steve Stockton (R-Texas). He was charged with the usual assortment of vague laws; mail fraud, wire fraud, false statements, campaign fraud, money laundering, etc. Two donors had contributed a total of $950,000 to a nonprofit owned by a friend, the Center for the American Future. Prosecutors allege Stockman misspent the money, including on his political campaign. He maintains the money never went to him, but was spent on legitimate nonprofit expenses. The donors were satisfied he spent their money for the educational nonprofit.
Stockman was running against Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) at the time. The nonprofit sent out a mailer which contrasted the positions of Stockman and Cornyn. It did not expressly advocate for Stockman, so he believed it did not violate election laws. Prosecutors contended otherwise.
Stockman was also charged with money laundering. Prosecutors said he wrote checks from a nonprofit he ran to two associates, who then turned around and donated to his campaign. Stockman says he paid them for work, and what they did with the money after that was up to them. When the discrepancy was discovered, the two were refunded their money and the FEC report was corrected. It should have been handled as a routine technical violation like it is for most political candidates. But when the two associates realized they were going to be prosecuted too, they turned on Stockman and took plea agreements.
It took prosecutors four grand juries to finally find one that would indict Stockman. As everyone knows, a good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. Stockman was eventually convicted. His supporters say the system was rigged against him; the judge denied all but two witnesses for the defense. He was not allowed to refer to anything political or mention Lois Lerner’s name in front of the jury. All of his defense motions were denied.
Stockton was targeted because of his conservative activism that ruffled feathers in high places. He insisted on investigating the IRS for going after conservative nonprofits. He filed a resolution for the arrest of IRS’s Lois Lerner for contempt of Congress. Coincidentally, the prosecutor who signed the indictment of Stockman was copied on emails from Lerner where she arranged to target conservative nonprofits. Stockman also pursued the impeachment of Attorney General Eric Holder for perjury, failure to comply with subpoenas and failure to discharge his duties. He really got to the DOJ there.
Plenty of Democrats have done far worse than Stockman and escaped consequences. Former Congressman Jon Corvine (D-NJ) was CEO and Chairman of MF Global when the company filed bankruptcy in 2011. He was asked to explain to Congress why $1.2 billion dollars of customer funds were missing. He said he didn’t know. Charges were never brought against him.
Stocman is sitting in jail awaiting sentencing. He shouldn’t be in jail, because he’s not at risk for fleeing. It is just one more intimidation tactic, made to wear him down and make him look like a serious offender. He faces up to 283 years in prison. His defense website observes, “If DOJ hadn’t settled on these their favorite charges against conservatives (fraud, money laundering, campaign finance issues) … they would have kept conniving until they found a complaint that would bring an indictment.” Let’s hope he appeals and gets some fair treatment finally.
Pardon. In full. And fire the DOJ scum.
I agree. The entire Federal court system has become a political tool by a career politicized DOJ out for their own enrichment. Read Sydney Powell’s book, Licensed to Lie.
It’s a filthy, criminal government we have....as bad as they get except for political executions which are probably in the works.
It’s a filthy, criminal government we have....as bad as they get except for political executions which are probably in the works.
Oh, so the DOJ can take down politicians after all.
Sure glad they caught this guy.
Why if they hadn’t, we might one day have presidential candidates who had openly committed felonies and came within a whisker of becoming president.
It’s nice to know Sessions’ agency is on the job.
“That’s a charge prosecutors turn to when they are having no luck showing the validity of the main charges.”
It is also the charge to which those guilty of more serious violations will often plead to avoid greater punishment. It has a lot of popularity with the political class e.g. Judge Ketchun of the WV Supreme Court
This guy needs a GO FUND ME
“He faces up to 283 years in prison”
Far more then say the average mass murderer.
For what? Paperwork irregularities?
The bureaucrats rule the country. They abuse their power and the “justice” system.
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.