“I haven’t called for capital punishment. I don’t think this is a capital punishment case. It is a Leavenworth prison case.”
It’s good to know that you rule out capital punishment. Knowing that puts us one step closer to agreeing.
A few more rational responses like that one, and we could have had a civil and informative conversation, and perhaps come to understand one another’s positions.
But instead you chose to get nasty. Go take a pill - I’m done with you.
I’m sorry you have an inability to accept the truth.
Your arguments are deeply flawed. I pointed that out for you.
You tossed out the topic of capital punishment as if anyone else had raised the issue. By inference, you were implying I was in favor of it.
My objection didn’t put us closer together. It simply outed you for using one more flawed tactic.
I understand your position just fine. I handed you your lunch based on it.
Get nasty? I guess that’s how you deal with defeat.