I’m sorry you have an inability to accept the truth.
Your arguments are deeply flawed. I pointed that out for you.
You tossed out the topic of capital punishment as if anyone else had raised the issue. By inference, you were implying I was in favor of it.
My objection didn’t put us closer together. It simply outed you for using one more flawed tactic.
I understand your position just fine. I handed you your lunch based on it.
Get nasty? I guess that’s how you deal with defeat.
My bad.
You kept stressing that this is a nation of laws, so I assumed you were advocating “full extent of the law” type sentences. I also assumed you meant “nobody is above the law”, so Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama would be rotting in jail.
But if you are only talking about fines, or brief stays at Club Fed (pending presidential pardon), for a handful of career bureaucrats, maybe we agree after all. I really can’t know what your positions are unless you tell me.
See, this is why it pays to state your positions factually, rather than engaging in a bunch of name-calling!