[antidemoncrat]

Safer for criminals.

[CincyRichieRich]

Yes, just look at Chicago...aka, Mayberry.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

[OttawaFreeper]

"But gun control advocates say ending gun-free zones would turn schools into the Wild West, with people who lack training or permits carrying weapons into classrooms, complicating matters for already overstretched and on-edge authorities." I guess things were really out of hand back when clubs like these were quite common, eh?

[vpintheak]

Safer for criminals, and creating more opportunity for mass murder and crime sprees. This is all these safe zones do.

[jazusamo]

MAGA!

Support Free Republic, Folks!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

[PIF]

Gun Free Zone, Active Shooter

[READINABLUESTATE]

Abolish large government run schools.

Dang! I’m a genius.

[umgud]

There is no guarantee a good guy with a gun will save the day, but there is an absolute guarantee the madman will have his way with no resistance.

[SkyDancer]

Depends upon how many signs there are, the more signs the safer the area.

[Cobra64]

Another topic that’s been discussed a million times but never made public on a national level thanks to The Stupid Party incompetence and guts.

[elbook]

for criminals practicing their trade it is.

[TBP]

Gun free zones are where most of the mass shootings occur. Well over 90 percent.

And in states with lower than average rates of gun ownership as well.

[MarkL]

“Gun free zones” tend to be soft targets, if they’re not visibly protected by armed guards.

Any predator, animal or human, will go after easier prey.

Combine that with the propaganda that comes when a terrorist organization murders children, or unarmed concert goers.

Mark

[Magnatron]

How can they possibly evaluate this fairly? There are multitudes more places where guns are allowed (or not banned in any case) than there are “gun free” zones.