Posted on 08/17/2018 8:29:49 AM PDT by SES1066
3 in 4 Chance Democrats win control (74.6%)
(Excerpt) Read more at projects.fivethirtyeight.com ...
President Hilliary will be pleased to hear this..................
—
She will have to wait until the House Impeaches and the Senate Removes both DJT an Pense making Pelosi President and after Nancy concedes in her favor (which would be a cold day in Hell).
You can’t argue with a track record like that lol.
Except that there's no evidence of anything like that happening, you're absolutely correct.
The dirty truth is incumbents usually get re-elected.
I dont see a throw the bums out mood like in 2006.
Weve got three months to find out if a Blue Wave will really swamp America.
Silver could be correct this time around as many Republican/conservative voters do not understand that losing the House all but guarantees none of DJT’s plans will go forward and that DJT will be Impeached and possibly Removed.
Silver said Hilliary would win in a landslide:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
About as correct as their last one
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
“The dirty truth is incumbents usually get re-elected”
The problem is over 30 GOP “incumbents” are not running for reelect, thus making open seats. Too many believed the polls last year and decided not to run. This is the reason why the polls and stats are not reliable. The GOP has more open seats than are needed to lose the house.
Silver said Hilliary would win in a landslide:
—
Then you did not understand what I was saying: to wit many will sit home to teach the current GOP a lesson (because they don’t like so and so, he/she’s a rino etc,) and goes the nation.
Same people who said Hillary had a 95% chance of winning right up until she lost.
This guy is about as accurate as Sabato. Which means he has no clue.
At least he's consistent.......smirk.
I don’t think the GOP-e wants to keep the House. Deep state RINOs are terrified of actually governing. They need at least one of three bodies, House, Senate or Presidency, to be democrat. That way they can play the “woe is us our hands are tied” game.
Slam dunk. Rhymes with damn drunk. There’s a poem in there somewhere, but I can’t be bothered writing it.
Didn't he say TRUMP had a 5% chance of becoming the Republican nominee?
On YouTube, you can see this bozo raising the criminal Hillary Clinton’s chances of winning the presidency over Trump to 78 percent about 8:30 election night. At about 10:15, Stephanopolous puts him on the spot about “changing our forecast” which of course, Silver denied, with some babble about Hillary not winning any of the competitive states. He is asked for a prediction and goes to the betting markets which favor Trump. I could have asked my cat to put his tail in the direction of the winner and have gotten a more reliable result.
He pretty much nailed the popular vote though, he was only off by about 1%. He called 48%-45% Hillary win, and it was actually 48%-46% Hillary win. Unfortunately, there is no electoral college for house seats, so if popular prediction is as accurate as his 2016 popular vote prediction, the House is lost.
Me too !
Well PICK UP
seats
Nate Silver: Just another Secular Progressive Capo trying to put his foot on the scale!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.