Posted on 08/16/2018 5:57:12 PM PDT by Sleeping Freeper
A trove of emails and handwritten notes from Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr exposes the continuous contact and communication between the DOJ attorney and anti-Trump dossier author Christopher Steele, according to notes and documents obtained by SaraACarter.com. The emails and notes were written between 2016 and 2017.
SNIP...
In June 2017, Steele tells Ohr, We are frustrated with how long this reengagement with the Bureau and Mueller is taking. Anything you can do to accelerate the process would be much appreciated. There are some new, perishable, operational opportunities which we do not want to miss out on.
In October 2017, Steele notes that he is concerned about the stories in the media about the bureau delivering information to Congress about my work and relationship with them. Very concerned about this. Peoples lives may be endangered.
And in November 2017, Steele, who is trying to engage with Robert Muellers Special Counsel, writes to Ohr saying, we were wondering if there was any response to the questions I raised last week.
Ohr responds by saying, I have passed on the questions (apparently to the special counsel) but havent gotten an answer yet.
Steele then says, I am presuming youve heard nothing back from your SC (special counsel) colleagues on the issues you kindly put to them from me. We have heard nothing from them either. To say this is disappointing would be an understatement! Certain people have been willing to risk everything to engage with them in an effort to help them reach the truth. Also, we remain in the dark as to what work has been briefed to Congress about us, our assets and previous work.
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
So when Mueller subpoenas President Trump to testify before a Grand Jury can he refuse because there has been a conspiracy to commit a coup led by Barack Obama,Hillary Clinton,The FBI,CIA,Justice Dept?
This whole investigation is and was started fraudulently,therefore The President will not cooperate with the corrupt actors.
I still maintain They are after President Trumps tax returns all his banking loan information so he can be charged like Manafort,that’s why this subpoena by Mueller won’t be made until the jury comes out with their verdict in the Manafort case.
This was never about Russian COLLUSION,that was just the excuse to go after his financials,so again can he refuse to cooperate in this fraudulently concocted conspiracy?
Ever since this bloke’s name came out and Harry married Meghan Markle I’ve had a slightly dimmer view of merry ol’ England.
____________________________
Now that is well said. I see you did not call Sean a "BLOWHARD".
Congratulations
https://saraacarter.com/about/ She is fantastic and hopefully years from now on day 1 of journalism and investigative reporting school where the question come up of "who are the great past investigative reporters", her picture will be there....
shuddup Sean...
Kim Strassel at the WSJ and Byron York at the Washington Examiner have also contributed several articles with information that helps put the puzzle pieces together.
And yet these people are still walking free and STILL have a top secret clearance.
We are so effed.
Do not overlook silent Judge Mueller who could take jurisdiction if he dared.
It’s explosive because it shows Mueller to be part of a criminal conspiracy.
Sure is starting to look that way.
Part of me wants to believe that Sessions is laying idle because he plans to strike back and knows more than we think he does. And that Trump is playing along.
Trump should pull Mueller’s security clearance :)
Really not so sure anymore...
The most depressing -- and frightening -- thing about this whole affair is watching people who know the truth do absolutely nothing.
They are all protecting their incomes.
Bttt.
5.56mm
ANNNND nothing will happen sadly.
They are 2 of the most invaluable people having broken this story. Kim is an absolute gem. I am less familiar with York’s work. Would it be worth it to search out his stories regarding this unprecedented political scandal.
You are welcome.
bttt
My apologies, Mrs. Hannity. Or are you Sean’s Dad?
I like Hannity and I like his show, but there is no denying that he constantly talks over his guests or that he will beat a dead horse completely to death. Some redundancy is necessary for people who only watch once a week or a few times a month. That way they dont miss important news if Sean only brought it up once. But Sean has gotten to the point where I just fast-forward through his entire monologue and go straight to his guests.
I wish Sean was more like Laura Ingraham. She does what Sean does, but without the quadruple redundancy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.