Posted on 08/08/2018 2:36:56 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Surely you are familiar with the old cliché, “Politics is a blood sport” — but now I suggest an update, “Politics is a betting sport” — due to the growing popularity of political prediction betting.
Of course, through the lens of the media, politics is already covered as a “game” with winners and losers, while the presidential Election Day equates to the “Super Bowl.”
Thus, with campaigns costing millions and daily lives affected by policy decisions, it is logical that prediction betting has become an armchair sport with odds that may foretell the outcome of an election or political event.
If you want to play along, the most popular online political prediction market where trading is legal for U.S. residents is called PredictIt. On Oct. 29, 2014, the federal government's Commodity Futures Trading Commission authorized the use of a “not-for-profit market for event contracts” operated by Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Days later, PredictIt launched on November 3, 2014.
But if you are not a betting person (myself included) the prediction market is still fun and informative to browse. The market offers a wide range of “contracts” where participants have placed bets with real money on the outcome of primaries, campaigns, elections, issues, events and various hot topics ripped from the headlines.
Let’s say you are enticed to join the game. After registering with a credit card you can begin monetizing your political hunches — or lose money following your political instincts.
How much can you bet? On PredictIt, the amount per contract is limited and regulated by that previously mentioned arm of the U.S. government as stated on the site:
“PredictIt operates under no-action relief from the Division of Market Oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. An $850 limit on investment by an individual participant in any contract is a condition of this relief.”
Also displayed on the site is this tip: “A key to success at PredictIt is knowing when to sell in order to take a profit or prevent a loss.”
Undoubtedly, over the next two years, a great deal of profit and loss, buying and selling will transpire speculating about this all-important market contract:
Who will win the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
As proof of this hyperactive market, while in the process of writing this piece, the odds changed four times!
Currently, President Trump dominates the market at 38 cents per share (meaning 38 percent of players believe that he will win.) Naturally, the president leads a large pack of Democratic Party competitors. The closest is Sen. Kamala Harris at 13 cents, followed by VP Joe Biden at 12 cents. Next is Sen. Bernie Sanders at 11 cents. Sen. Elizabeth Warren garners 7 cents, while 6 cents says that VP Mike Pence will win the White House in 2020.
In all PredictIt market events, the probability is displayed in cents as explained on the site:
“PredictIt allows you to make predictions on future events by buying shares in the outcome. Each outcome has a probability between 1 and 99 percent. We convert those probabilities into US cents.”
Each winning share is redeemed for a dollar at the close of the event. However, it is very important to read all the rules governing the buying and selling of contracts.
Moreover, unlike on the Wall Street “casino,” where trading based on inside information is illegal, at PredictIt utilizing “political” inside information is perfectly legal.
Perhaps you or someone you know works on Capitol Hill and has a keen insight as to whether or not Republicans will keep control of the House and Senate after the November midterms. You are free to make prediction bets using that information — which begs the question, “Where does the prediction market stand on the outcome of the midterm elections?” Here is the probability at this writing:
"Which party will control the House after the 2018 midterms?"
Democrats: 66 percent
Republicans: 36 percent
"Which party will control the Senate after the 2018 midterms?"
Republicans: 73 percent
Democrats: 30 percent
Besides election results and presidential horseraces, PredictIt is filled with trivial prediction markets — even about Trump’s tweets! (You can’t make this stuff up.)
“How many tweets will @potus post from noon Aug. 3 to noon Aug. 10?”
Furthermore, in response to the Trump administration’s “market” for drama and chaos, PredictIt created a new category of prediction events aptly named "Investigations." Here are some active markets reflecting the legal jeopardy of some Trump friends and family:
“Will [Michael] Cohen face changes by 12/31/18?”
Yes 77 percent
No 23 percent
“Trump, Jr. faces charges by the end of 2018?”
Yes 25 percent
No 75 percent
“Will [Roger] Stone face charges by 12/31/18?”
Yes 57 percent
No 43 percent
Another aspect of the political prediction market is those enmeshed in politics have been known to look at PredictIt to gauge whether opinion polls are compatible, or signal a vastly different outcome. Then, closer to Election Day, don’t be surprised to hear PredictIt odds quoted in media reports.
Finally, here is some surprising news about PredictIt as a brand. “Washington politicos are not common users. PredictIt players are typically working in finance and other analysis and data-heavy industries,” according to PredictIt spokesman Will Jennings in a June interview with Business Insider.
Jennings also said, “The average PredictIt user is young, male, and relatively affluent from major US cities like New York and San Francisco.”
Then Jennings revealed this info-nugget: “The gamblers who regularly play PredictIt will often reach out to seasoned political reporters asking for some kind of inside scoop.” Prompting the question, “Who is influencing whom? Are the “gamblers” and “politicos” influencing each other? If so, that makes PredictIt rather circular. And if circular, PredictIt is even more interesting and potentially more influential to watch.
And Election Betting Odds has chances of impeachment. However, EBO was disastrously wrong about 2016.
A good example of why being able to hack an election would
be useful to more than just an established political party or foreign government.
Not quite. It means that 38 percent of the money is on Trump to win. The upper limit on betting should help prevent a few partisans, with deep pockets, from skewing results.
Prediction markets have a lot of potential -- e.g. compared to polling, people are putting their money where their mouth is. Several years ago, I started some threads, and made numerous posts about prediction markets.
“Prediction markets have a lot of potential — e.g. compared to polling, people are putting their money where their mouth is.”
i suspect they’re not particularly useful, and pretty much just reflect “common wisdom”. For instance, predictit.com odds were in the vicinity of 4-1/5-1 that Hillary would win ... BTW, I cleaned up big time betting on Trump ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.