Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Special Election: Democrat Turnout 87% of 2016 Total — GOP Turnout Only 40% of 2016 Total
GP ^ | August 7,2018 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 08/08/2018 5:53:27 AM PDT by Hojczyk

On Tuesday Troy Balderson defeated Democrat Danny O’Connor by less than 1% of the vote.

Balderson had 100,052 votes compared to Tiberi’s 251,266 votes in 2016 or 40% of the 2016 turnout.

Danny O’Connor had 98,364 votes on Tuesday compared to 112,638 votes received by Democrat Ed Albertson in 2016 or 87% of the 2016 Turnout.

This should concern Republican party leaders. The GOP to do a better job or Trump is going to face a Democrat Congress ready to impeach him in 2019.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2018midterms; balderson; dannyoconnor; gotv; oh2018; ohiospecialelection; troybalderson; turnout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 last
To: vette6387

I’m just reporting what people on the ground in OH were hearing from their call bank people.


121 posted on 08/08/2018 4:13:21 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

“A Republican district, yes, but Kasich, Tiberi, Balderson aren’t cut from the cloth we need. I heard a caller on a.m. talk radio this morning say that Trump got him to come out and vote. He was mad at Tiberi for voting against Obamacare repeal and almost didn’t vote for Balderson...”

Seem lilke this is a recurring theme. We get a replacement that will not help Trump. I get it that he had to pull this turd Balderson over the finish line because a tenth of a loaf is better than no bread at all, but we need to have a new candidate ready for November. There will not be enough time to see if Balderson is any good, and we need better for the next two years!


122 posted on 08/08/2018 6:04:51 PM PDT by vette6387 (shoul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

I’m sure you noticed that they conveniently found more votes with a majority of those going to the Dim candidate and then they found more.-—no, no vote fraud, none at all.


123 posted on 08/09/2018 11:22:40 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: tiki

Yes they found a few hundred, probably fraudulent votes. But Balderson had 151,000 fewer votes total, which isn’t fraud, it is stupid lazy republicans. You can obsess all you want about a few hundred votes, but it is the the hundred thousand votes that are at issue, and have nothing to do with fraud.


124 posted on 08/09/2018 12:18:28 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Total BS....


125 posted on 08/09/2018 12:19:35 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Whiskey Tango Foxtrot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson