There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to donate to Wikipedia — ever. It is just another leftist hackneyed operation just like Snopes, only on a larger scale.
I’m sure if you checked Snopes to see reports that Jeoung is a racist it would come back as....
False.
That's precious.
OK. Wikipedia has confirmed that it too, like all other media, is firmly on the side of the hate-White left.
Here is what the relevant section looks like at the moment
“In August 2018, Jeong was hired by The New York Times to join its editorial board as lead writer on technology, commencing in September.[18] The hiring sparked a strongly negative reaction in conservative media and social media, which highlighted derogatory tweets about white people that Jeong had posted mostly in 2013 and 2014.[19][20] Critics characterized her tweets as being racist; Jeong said that the posts were “counter-trolling” in reaction to harassment she had experienced, and that she regretted adopting that tactic.[19] The Times stated that it had reviewed her social media history before hiring her, and that it did not condone the posts.[19][20]”
LOL! Wikipedia is not considered a "reliable source." Colleges ban students from quoting Wikipedia as a source.
Trump should tweet about the “racist NYT” instead of the “failing NYT.” That might get them to rethink their recent hire.
Wikipedia is all right for benign stuff, like if you want to look up an article about no. 2 pencils, but it's just worthless for anything related to politics, religion or really any controversial topics.
Some of the best dirt you get on the left is reading the “editing” page on Wikipedia. If this keeps up, they’ll find a way to hide it.
Her best tweets concerned the NY Times itself!
She wrote:
After a bad day, some people come home and kick the furniture. I get on the Internet and make fun of The New York Times.
I dont feel safe in a country that is led by someone who takes Thomas Friedman seriously.
Hannah Rosin shatters ceiling by proving women writers can be as hackish as Tom Friedman, too.
[David] Brooks is an absolute nitwit tho.
Notajoke: Im being forced to read Nicholas Kristof. This is the worst.
if I had a bajillion dollars, Id buy the New York Times, just for the pleasure of firing Tom Friedman .
We cant let this one go. She must be driven out of her job or the New York Times destroyed. It is a joke and nothing but a racist organization.
Wikipedia is the CIA factbook. It’s what they allow and want us to think.
nyt racist
wiki racist
Use infogalactic.com instead - its a clone of Wikipedia that will remain objective to truth and not the ideological whims of a few self selected editors.
Might as well describe Josef Mengele as a “visionary medical researcher”.
Wikipedia editors, as I understand it, are for the most part under 30 and socialist to the core.
When this Sarah Jeong thing started the hypocrisy of firing Roseanne came to mind. The difference is not only does Jeong get to keep her job but she insulted a whole race. Roseanne only insulted one member of One race and that person is only possesses a small percentage of black blood. It is very, very hypocritical.
Every occasion of this should be documented under Leftist Lies/Fraud/Dishonesty/Censorship/Data Manipulation in Conservapedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia
BOYCOTT Wikipedia for their abuse of the truth
Need to start using phrases like :
“Nazi Style Truth” — since millenials and other recent (last 40 years) public school educations have been taught and thus recognize “nazi” attrocities/propaganda — but not communist attrocities/propaganda)
“Communist Style Truth” — doesnt resonate as much (but still can be used in more sane venues)
add to that :
“Nazi Style Science” — for the leftist media’s pushing/defending/assisting the global warming/climate change hoaxes
Speaking of wikipedia why does lisa page still have no wikipedia entry?