Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Predict Mass Extinction Could Be Triggered By 2100
studyfinds.org ^

Posted on 08/04/2018 7:57:53 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

July 28, 2018Earth, Environment

Scientists Predict Mass Extinction Could Be Triggered By 2100 by Ben Renner

BOSTON — Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) predict that by 2100, the earth’s oceans will contain so much carbon that a sixth mass extinction will begin.

“This is not saying that disaster occurs the next day,” explains Daniel Rothman, a professor of geophysics in the MIT Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, about his recent study in a media release. “It’s saying that, if left unchecked, the carbon cycle would move into a realm which would be no longer stable, and would behave in a way that would be difficult to predict. In the geologic past, this type of behavior is associated with mass extinction.”

Over the past 540 million years, Earth has been through five mass extinctions. Each event, according to scientists, was precipitated by events that disrupted or upended the natural cycling of carbon through the oceans and atmosphere. These global carbon cycle disruptions each took thousands or millions of years, and coincided with each massive die-off of many of the planet’s species.

Climatologists and other scientists have long speculated that the carbon cycle of our modern age is being fatally disrupted. The main difference between carbon cycle disruptions of the past and now, of course, is time. Carbon levels have only been rising precipitously for the past 100 to 150 years, hardly comparable to disruptions of ancient times.

(Excerpt) Read more at studyfinds.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; acidityhoax; banstrawsnow; carbon; catastrophism; co2; could; danielrothman; doomed; extinction; globalwarminghoax; greennewdeal; homosexualagenda; libertarians; mediawingofthednc; medicalmarijuana; oceans; panicporn; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; shtf; smearmachine; somuchformit; teotwawki; theskyisfalling; totalbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Sub-Driver

Researchers predict, if left unchecked, difficult to predict, have long speculated, hardly comparable, could play out, it’s anyone’s guess.

“The study, which was supported in part by NASA and the National Science Foundation...”

I predict more funding will be needed soon.


61 posted on 08/05/2018 1:11:20 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 trillion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
This isn’t science it’s some fake psychic reading a crystal ball...

A cracked crystal ball at that.

62 posted on 08/05/2018 1:54:20 AM PDT by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: roadcat
You plan to die someday? Not me! I hope I'm one of the 8% of the human race that live forever.

Yup! Many people aren't aware that 8% of humans never die. It's trivial to calculate. Just take A and divide it by B, where:
A = number of people born on the planet Earth who have never died and are still alive today.
B = total number of humans who have every lived on Earth.

You'll find the figure for (B) online, estimated to be 105 billion.

And the figure for (A) is there too. There are currently close to 8 billion humans alive today. So 8 billion / 105 billion is almost 8%. QED.

What? You don't like my math? Well, too bad. Because my calculations are at least as logical and supportable as the Algor crowd's calculations. So there!

63 posted on 08/05/2018 2:00:36 AM PDT by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC ("Blessed are the young, for they shall inherit the national debt" - Pr. Herbert Hoover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred

Is it 90% of all scientists?

90% of all the scientists surveyed, chosen from the group with the largest climate related grants ...:)


64 posted on 08/05/2018 2:14:41 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Trumpet 1

What is an “ORT cloud?”


65 posted on 08/05/2018 2:24:57 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

These eschatological predictions have the characteristics tea leaf readings. I say, beware of false prophets.


66 posted on 08/05/2018 2:28:54 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/solar-system/oort-cloud/overview/


67 posted on 08/05/2018 2:33:42 AM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

EQ’s dog predicts that eating kale could cause mental retardation in liberals.


68 posted on 08/05/2018 4:14:36 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Proud member of the DWN party. (Deplorable Wing Nut))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpet 1

with apologies to Mr. Hatcher ... “ enlighten me!”

I am aware of the idea / theory of the Oort cloud, but not the ORT cloud.

huh?


69 posted on 08/05/2018 4:32:49 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

precisely! it’s a carbon CYCLE!

said cycle necessarily intersects with the Oxygen cycle(s).


70 posted on 08/05/2018 4:34:50 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t think “predict” and “might” belong together in a sentence.


71 posted on 08/05/2018 4:41:46 AM PDT by Jim Noble (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12; Sub-Driver

Good call.
Pretty much no one alive today will be around in 2100, either, so what’s to worry about?


72 posted on 08/05/2018 4:56:22 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (Life is simpler when you plow around the stump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
“It’s saying that, if left unchecked, the carbon cycle would move into a realm which would be no longer stable, and would behave in a way that would be difficult to predict. In the geologic past, this type of behavior is associated with mass extinction.”

If... would... would... would behave... difficult to predict... is associated with"

Yeah. That's SCIENCE!!!!

And that's a definitive proof of the desired (to a journalism's need for attention and ratings dollars) result!

IF Teacher317 was in a Hollywood Oscars party, Scarlett Johansson WOULD be there as well, and the party WOULD lead to meetings and liaisons, and these would be DIFFICULT TO PREDICT. In the past, this type of BEHAVIOR HAS BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH stars hooking up with non-celebrities, and thus, Teacher317 WILL definitely marry Scarlett Ingrid Johansson!!!

It has to happen. A 90% majority of the scientists I paid have said so.

73 posted on 08/05/2018 4:58:41 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

By the year 2100, virtually everyone on this planet who is over the age of 30 today will be dead so their prediction is kinda true......


74 posted on 08/05/2018 5:02:10 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (I once found a needle in a haystack but it wasn't the one I was looking for...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

No, they aren’t wrong. Anything ‘could’ happen, doesn’t mean it’s likely, lol.


75 posted on 08/05/2018 5:06:49 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
Here ya go!...The great Nazi propaganda minister, Goebbels


76 posted on 08/05/2018 5:25:41 AM PDT by equaviator (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The answer to this impending doom is obvious, same as always. All we have to do is send all of our money to the unelected tyrannical oligarchy of “world leaders” and they’ll take care of this for us.


77 posted on 08/05/2018 5:28:24 AM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

globalists, illegals, drug traffickers, socialists communsts, facists, democrats, and dumb a## self hating white people?? ok


78 posted on 08/05/2018 5:32:06 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Just another Chicken Little Renew-My-Research-Grant mantra.

And in 2100 if the scientists are wrong, they’ll give the money back. Yeah, right.


79 posted on 08/05/2018 6:13:18 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Were computer models used?

Garbage in, garbage out.


80 posted on 08/05/2018 6:17:57 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson