Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/01/2018 5:52:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

how many divisions will he block us with?


2 posted on 08/01/2018 5:53:56 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Uh.... no he doesn’t.


3 posted on 08/01/2018 5:55:20 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Leftist judge employs censorship...next is bible burning.


5 posted on 08/01/2018 5:56:03 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (17...#1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Uh, that ship has sailed, bud.....


6 posted on 08/01/2018 6:00:26 AM PDT by JParris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The judge might just as well repeal the law of gravity.


7 posted on 08/01/2018 6:00:53 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That cat’s out of the bag. It’s already been downloaded 1000x over. It’ll just be driven into the dark web and within tight circles.


8 posted on 08/01/2018 6:01:57 AM PDT by BBQToadRibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s the INTERNET. The WORLD WIDE WEB.

Yeah. Good luck with that.


9 posted on 08/01/2018 6:04:15 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Send the blueprints to Kim.com...he is on a rampage for free speech this morning.


11 posted on 08/01/2018 6:05:12 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (17...#1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Where is this so called “judge” getting the authority to do this?


13 posted on 08/01/2018 6:06:43 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed a suit challenging the Trump administration’s

This inferior court has no more authority to issue this ruling where a "State" is the petitioner than I have.

In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.
14 posted on 08/01/2018 6:10:42 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Um... people already have them. Bit late.


15 posted on 08/01/2018 6:14:48 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

With issues like this and immigration it is like playing judicial Wack-A-Mole. There seems to be no negative consequence to judges issuing national decrees. Why have a legislature?


17 posted on 08/01/2018 6:26:19 AM PDT by Dennis M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Translation - Federal judge ignores the 1st Amendment and censors free speech.


18 posted on 08/01/2018 6:27:06 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Judge Lasnik can go screw himself. Here's a link to the code if anyone wants it:
CodeIsFreeSpeech.com

Pass it on. We will not submit, we will not comply.

19 posted on 08/01/2018 6:31:55 AM PDT by Jed Eckert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What are they trying to Distract from ?


22 posted on 08/01/2018 6:45:03 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The cat is all ready out of the bag. The only way to stop the manufacture of 3-D printed guns is to outlaw the use and ownership of 3-S printers. Owning a gun that defeats detection is against the law. I’m just sayin’


23 posted on 08/01/2018 6:46:29 AM PDT by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I just downloaded it and posted to several message boards to flip the bird at "your honor". Here is a good site if your interested in doing the same:

https://archive.org/details/@anticensor1

28 posted on 08/01/2018 7:11:35 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How the hell does this joker have any authority outside of his district?


29 posted on 08/01/2018 7:13:00 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

For the last 30 years undetectable guns have been outlawed.
1988 guess the ace reporters didn’t know it or hiding it.


30 posted on 08/01/2018 7:15:36 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Dems are worried Terrorists will use these plastic single shot guns for mass murder and take over the World


31 posted on 08/01/2018 7:29:55 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson