Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
how many divisions will he block us with?
2 posted on
08/01/2018 5:53:56 AM PDT by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
3 posted on
08/01/2018 5:55:20 AM PDT by
The Toll
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Leftist judge employs censorship...next is bible burning.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Uh, that ship has sailed, bud.....
6 posted on
08/01/2018 6:00:26 AM PDT by
JParris
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The judge might just as well repeal the law of gravity.
7 posted on
08/01/2018 6:00:53 AM PDT by
MV=PY
(The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That cat’s out of the bag. It’s already been downloaded 1000x over. It’ll just be driven into the dark web and within tight circles.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s the INTERNET. The WORLD WIDE WEB.
Yeah. Good luck with that.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Send the blueprints to Kim.com...he is on a rampage for free speech this morning.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Where is this so called “judge” getting the authority to do this?
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed a suit challenging the Trump administrations
This inferior court has no more authority to issue this ruling where a "State" is the petitioner than I have.
In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.
14 posted on
08/01/2018 6:10:42 AM PDT by
eyeamok
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Um... people already have them. Bit late.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
With issues like this and immigration it is like playing judicial Wack-A-Mole. There seems to be no negative consequence to judges issuing national decrees. Why have a legislature?
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Translation - Federal judge ignores the 1st Amendment and censors free speech.
18 posted on
08/01/2018 6:27:06 AM PDT by
taxcontrol
(Stupid should hurt)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Judge Lasnik can go screw himself. Here's a link to the code if anyone wants it:
CodeIsFreeSpeech.comPass it on. We will not submit, we will not comply.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
What are they trying to Distract from ?
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The cat is all ready out of the bag. The only way to stop the manufacture of 3-D printed guns is to outlaw the use and ownership of 3-S printers. Owning a gun that defeats detection is against the law. I’m just sayin’
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I just downloaded it and posted to several message boards to flip the bird at "your honor". Here is a good site if your interested in doing the same:
https://archive.org/details/@anticensor1
28 posted on
08/01/2018 7:11:35 AM PDT by
apillar
To: E. Pluribus Unum
How the hell does this joker have any authority outside of his district?
29 posted on
08/01/2018 7:13:00 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
For the last 30 years undetectable guns have been outlawed.
1988 guess the ace reporters didn’t know it or hiding it.
30 posted on
08/01/2018 7:15:36 AM PDT by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Dems are worried Terrorists will use these plastic single shot guns for mass murder and take over the World
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson