Skip to comments.
White House: Trump Has Started ‘Mechanism’ for Pulling Security Clearances from ‘Certain Individuals
Brietbart ^
| 25 July 2018
| Joshua Caplan
Posted on 07/25/2018 5:06:14 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
BOOM...
As in, “Lower the BOOM on their heads”...
61
posted on
07/25/2018 7:19:38 PM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: carriage_hill
62
posted on
07/25/2018 7:39:44 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain; Lakeside Granny
YASS!!
Love this timely REMINDER....
63
posted on
07/25/2018 7:42:22 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: Vince Ferrer
You know that Sandy Berger had died, right?
64
posted on
07/25/2018 8:09:43 PM PDT
by
Does so
(No mention of "Brown Shirts" on this page?)
To: Vlad The Inhaler
65
posted on
07/25/2018 8:19:15 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
To: semimojo
The perception among the voters may be that they DO have access and therefore what they claim has some merit...when in reality there is no merit.
To: Does so; Vince Ferrer
I must admit if I knew he had died, I had forgotten it.
Sad. To think that what you will be best known to posterity for is sticking classified documents down your pants.
Well, he is gone now. Cancer in 2015.
67
posted on
07/25/2018 8:23:08 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
To: JerseyDvl
The clearances don’t matter. Access is given on a “need to know” basis. Providing classified information to an unauthorized person without a “need to know” is crime even if the person has the proper clearances.
68
posted on
07/25/2018 8:31:07 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
state proteges that feed them information.
This is a crime.
69
posted on
07/25/2018 8:32:13 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: central_va
“state proteges that feed them information.
This is a crime.”
Not necessarily. If the person (e.g. Clapper) has unlimited access than the protégé can probably do it legally.
Which is why I advocate narrowing the clearance's “need to know” and only allow them access to specified administration personnel. If a deep state protégé violated these restrictions it would then be a crime.
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
“What a day. A deal with the EU, Rosenstein, and revoking those slime buckets credentials. Sleep well DJT.”
Yeah, those and squashing CNN’s scumbag Kaitlan Collins like a bug, and today is one of those days of winning like no other ...
71
posted on
07/25/2018 9:24:30 PM PDT
by
catnipman
((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
To: rlmorel
I pray to God it was from bleeding out from paper cuts to his “unit”
72
posted on
07/25/2018 10:01:40 PM PDT
by
LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
(TRUMP TRAIN !!! Get the hell out of the way if you are not on yet because we don't stop for idiots)
To: Vince Ferrer
73
posted on
07/25/2018 10:58:35 PM PDT
by
Shady
(We WON the Battle, Now let's WIN THE WAR!!!!)
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
Arrest, try and hang Brennan, Comey and Hillary.
74
posted on
07/26/2018 12:17:39 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: Eleutheria5
75
posted on
07/26/2018 12:42:08 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: Mean Daddy
Re: “I cant imagine any of them being briefed”
><><
Maybe their comrades (who still work with classified information in the government) are feeding it to them?
76
posted on
07/26/2018 12:42:12 AM PDT
by
deks
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
NO ONE that isn’t doing Govt. work should keep their clearances after they leave!! NO ONE!
77
posted on
07/26/2018 1:05:14 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Not necessarily. If the person (e.g. Clapper) has unlimited access than the protégé can probably do it legally.Clapper has to have a "need to know". Working for CNN is not a "need to know". Have you ever has a security clearance? I have. TS/SBI.
78
posted on
07/26/2018 3:53:27 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: deks
That could very well be, but like you alluded to, not in an official capacity. Either way, it would be illegal.
79
posted on
07/26/2018 4:08:42 AM PDT
by
Mean Daddy
(Every time Hillary lies, a demon gets its wings. - Windflier)
To: crz
You have to start somewhere. Even if it’s a fruitless battle.
80
posted on
07/26/2018 5:33:46 AM PDT
by
ImJustAnotherOkie
(All I know is what I read in the papers.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson