In the 90s, we stood against rape, assault, infidelity and the use of private eyes to intimidate and silence witnesses.
At the present we stand against infidelity.
That’s all we have to stand against, and I think that’s an important distinction.
During the "Bimbo Eruption" phase, before Clinton was elected, Democrats said they didn't care about infidelity. Why? Because they did not want their man damaged. They did not care about anything else. They knew it was wrong, and they did it anyway. Republicans said, rightly, that "character mattered". It even became the Republican Party's catch phrase for a time. This was all well before the rape charges. Had the Democrats not accepted that serial philanderer, the country would not have had to later suffer through having to deal with a rapist and perjurer President.
At the present we stand against infidelity.
No, most don't. Just skim through the comments on this thread. Most people on this site don't care about infidelity any longer. We have all now accepted the early 90s Democrat view of moral expectations for our office holders. It's our new default position.