Posted on 07/18/2018 10:27:21 PM PDT by iowamark
Sleeping Giants is far from the most recognizable name among left-wing activist groups, but its made its presence felt in numerous boycott campaigns against conservative commentators, publications, and organizations. Now, a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation has unmasked its anonymous founder.
Sleeping Giants launched in November 2016, with a self-described mission of stopping racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and anti-Semitic news sites by stopping their ad dollars. Its targets have included the prominent conservative website Breitbart, conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham, the Canada-based Rebel Media, former Fox News host Bill OReilly, and the National Rifle Association (NRA).
The groups primary tactic is to spur followers to deluge companies Twitter accounts with demands to cut ties with the targeted figure or group. It is responsible for a 90% drop in Breitbarts advertisers over a two-month period, the resignation of hedge fund CEO Robert Mercer from Renaissance Technologies because of Mercers financial stake in Breitbart, and more than 250 companies pulling ads from Rebel Media over a three-month period.
Sleeping Giants also pushed dozens of companies to drop Ingrahams Fox News show (though ultimately failing to damage her ratings) and attempted to get Adidas to drop rapper Kanye West, who has raised headlines and eyebrows in recent months for dissenting from liberal orthodoxy. The group has defended companies like Target from conservative boycotts over its LGBT advocacy and its policy allowing men to use womens restrooms, as well.
The groups founder has previously given interviews only on condition of anonymity, being identified only as someone who works in marketing. But the Daily Caller matched clues in those interviews, such as an anecdote about a Twitter exchange with IKEA that inspired his groups strategy, to since-deleted social media posts by Matt Rivitz, a San Francisco-based ad copywriter with the firm Goodby Silverstein & Partners.
Rivitz declined to provide a comment to the Daily Caller, but has since confirmed his identity.
While this isnt obviously how I wanted things to play out, I have nothing to hide, Rivitz wrote on Sleeping Giants Facebook page. I, and the rest of the team here, have always wanted to stay anonymous to keep this about the mission rather than the individuals involved. That hasnt changed.
Breitbart notes that Sleeping Giants previously claimed anonymity because we have jobs that pay our salaries and we dont think they need to be wrapped up in this. Now that Rivitz has been revealed, however, questions have emerged as to whether it targeted companies he was working for in his day job.
As some Twitter users were quick to point out, several major Goodby Silverstein & Partners clients, including BMW, Adobe, and Xfinity, have all been targets of Sleeping Giants boycotts, Breitbarts Ian Mason wrote. Rivitz quickly denied he worked for Goodby Silverstein during the relevant period to create a conflict of interest, but he has not addressed where Rivitz has worked in the period he was pressuring advertisers to blacklist conservatives.
So far, Sleeping Giants only other named member is San Francisco ad writer Britton Taylor. A March profile in GQ wrote that a few of them work in marketing-related fields in which their off-hours activism might be perceived as creating some kind of conflict of interest, raising the question of how many other potential conflicts remain.
Following the report, some have criticized the Daily Caller for doxxing Rivitz (the practice of outing personal identifying details on the internet, opening someone to potential harassment), with Sleeping Giants itself suggesting that Twitter has a little problem with harassment, doxxing and death threats on this platform.
Breitbarts Brandon Darby responded to the charge by suggesting that Rivitz was using anonymity as a cover from which to smear his targets. If you do media campaigns and publicly call someone a racist as you hide behind anonymous [accounts], they have every right to defend themselves and to publicly identify their accuser, he tweeted.
More like sleeping pansies.
Ethics in business are an anathema to Democrats.
He’d publicly work for clients while privately lobbying against them. If he wasn’t in California, a decent AG would be on his butt as you’re possibly acting fraudulently.
Anti-Semitic? Oh, so they’re boycotting the Democrat party.
“I have nothing to hide.” Yeah, right. Then why upset now that your identity is public?
Sleeping Giants? Yeah, right. I would call them a Small Group of Millionaire Fascists who want governmental control of all businesses.
See to me this is something Rush or Mark should out this cuck and his army of bots.
BOOKMARK!!
Hed publicly work for clients while privately lobbying against them. If he wasnt in California, a decent AG would be on his butt as youre possibly acting fraudulently.
\
\
BINGO little fraudster. taking their money.
how does this story remind you of the ren hen?
And your speech
I consider not letting certain people eat in your restaurant as a type of a boycott.
This is big time criminal and will almost certainly get him sued into oblivion by his former clients who got played.
what this dude is doing is illegal and has nothing to do with individuals protesting.
maybe more unethical and violation of a company’s policy.
This is big time criminal and will almost certainly get him sued into oblivion by his former clients who got played.
/
/
We’ll see. Nobody has the balls to stand up to these outraged lefties.
The ends justifies the means to the Left.
I hope he gets sued into oblivion.
He messed with some big players in the corporate world. I wouldn’t want to be the counterparty on his life insurance, that’s for sure - especially if he can’t pay up on the big claims coming his way.
Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.