Posted on 07/14/2018 8:49:56 AM PDT by jazusamo
If you watched disgraced FBI Agent Peter Strzok bob and weave around the truth in his testimony to Congress this week you will understand our difficulty in getting Strzoks official communications out of the FBI/Justice Department.
We dont give up, however, and we are succeeding.
We just released 87 pages of records from the Department of Justice revealing former top FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Pages profanity-laced disdain for FBI hierarchy and policies. The DOJ, meanwhile, is resisting our request for a court order to preserve all responsive Page-Strzok communications.
Strzok and Pages anti-Trump text messages became center-stage amid allegations of bias at the bureau, and both were subpoenaed to testify before the House Judiciary and the Oversight and Government Reform Committees.
We obtained the documents through a January 2018 Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit filed after the DOJ failed to respond to a December 4, 2017, FOIA request ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00154)). The lawsuit is seeking:
The new emails came in response to a May 21, order by U.S. District Court Judge Reggie B. Walton for the FBI to begin processing 13,000 pages of previously undisclosed records exchanged exclusively between FBI officials Strzok and Page between February 1, 2015, and December 2017. The first 500 pages of records are to be processed by June 29, 2018. This process will take over two years to complete.
Emails between Strzok and Page include conversations about a change in FBI policy that eventually would allow companies to discuss National Security Letters , which are secret non-court issued subpoenas for records:
From: Strzok, Peter P. (WF) (FBI)
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 3:34 PM
To: Page, Lisa C. (OGC) (FBI)
Subject: FWD: FBI to Allow Companies to Reveal When They Receive National Security Letters
Sigh are you fing kidding
From: Page, Lisa C. (OGC) (FBI)
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 3:36 PM
To: Strzok, Peter P. (WF) (FBI)
Subject: RE: FBI to Allow Companies to Reveal When They Receive National Security Letters
Sigh. This is the third conversation I will have had with him or someone on his staff about this.
On February 9, 2015, in a discussion of an article about how the Department of Defense may have unwisely used an Arabic translator in a Guantanamo hearing who had also been used as a translator at a CIA black site, Strzok says, I cannot begin to describe the amount of f*ckupedness if true Page replies, I know. I heard about it on npr on my way home tonight. Multiple mentions of the FBIs infiltration of defense teams last year too.
On June 1, we filed a motion for preservation order in this case asking the court to order the Department of Justice to prevent both Strzok and Page from deleting any incriminating records of their communications. We argue that several of the text messages produced to Congress reference work-related communications between Strzok and Page through personal accounts.
We noted that in January , the DOJ told Congress that the FBI had neither requested nor searched information from the personal accounts of Strzok and Page. We argued:
In a January 25, 2018 letter to Senator Charles Grassley, Charles Thorley, Acting Assistant Director of the FBI, wrote, FBI has not requested from Ms. Page or Mr. Strzok any information from their personal email accounts, nor has the FBI conducted searches of non-FBI issued communications devices or non-FBI email accounts associated with Mr. Strzok or Ms. Page .
Under the law, [a]n officer or employee of an executive agency may not create or send a record using a non-official electronic messaging account unless such officer or employee- (1) ,copies an official electronic messaging account of the officer or employee in the original creation or transmission of the record; or (2) forwards a complete copy of the record to an official electronic messaging account of the officer or employee not later than 20 days after the original creation or transmission of the record.
Not until May did the FBI say it had written Strzok and Page letters asking them to preserve the communications but there have been no assurances that this was even done:
[Judicial Watch] has asked for copies of those letters and of any responses it has received from Strzok and Page. [DOJ] refuses to provide any evidence supporting this assertion.
Because [Judicial Watch] does not know specifically what [DOJ] asked Strzok and Page to do and what, if any, steps Strzok and Page are taking to ensure preservation, [Judicial Watch] is concerned [DOJs] mere requests to Strzok and Page are insufficient. [Judicial Watch] therefore is concerned records responsive to [Judicial Watchs] FOIA request will be lost or not otherwise searched.
[Judicial Watchs] request is nothing out of the ordinary. At least three other judges of this Court have granted such requests in the last 18 months.
We are in court successfully getting Strzok-Page documents thus far denied to Congress. Yet the Justice Department is stonewalling and even protecting Strzok and Page by battling our request for preservation order to ensure that no government documents are destroyed.
President Trump hit a home run with his nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The President stood up for the U.S. Constitution with this nomination. Judge Kavanaugh has a demonstrated record of applying the rule of law rather than legislating from the bench. His record shows that he will apply the U.S. Constitution as written and intended by our Founding Fathers.
This nomination is a great victory for constitutional government and a blow to politicized decision-making on the Supreme Court. We have too many politicians as it is in DC, and we certainly dont need any more on the Supreme Court. Most Americans agree with Judge Kavanaugh that the Supreme Court should apply the law as it is written and leave the legislating to the peoples elected representatives in Congress.
The Senate should move quickly to work with President Trump to consider and approve Judge Kavanaugh. There is not much radical liberals can do to stop this excellent Supreme Court pick. We arent surprised by leftist smears, religious bigotry, and more threats of violence, but the votes are there for Judge Kavanaugh to be confirmed.
Please be sure to let your senators know what you think about the Kavanaugh nomination directly! You can reach your senators offices at 202-224-3121. Letters and emails work, too. All their contact information is available at www.senate.gov.
Great minds think alike :)
What we need to know is who is being black mailed by foreign powers. I am sure there are lots of politicans who are being blackmailed by our own CIA or FBI. And now that we know the Chinese and Russians are pretty much reading everything on our computers, its safe to assume that Paul Ryan and others are leaving their posts because someone some where has the dirt on them.
Yes, it is. I read some on him yesterday, he was involved with the CIA as or for a contractor of some sort.
Strzok Jr. lived in Africa for part of his young life with family.
Even Congress did not get any documents that were really incriminating. The FBI/DOJ has no problem hiding or destroying documents that they don’t want anyone to see.
I wouldn’t doubt that.
Thanks.
Once a CIA agent?
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/521885088
Total Revenue |
$37,863,937 |
|
---|---|---|
Total Functional Expenses | $24,486,270 | |
Net income | $13,377,667 | |
Notable sources of revenue | Percent of total revenue | |
Contributions | $35,395,354 | 93.5% |
Program services | $29,234 | 0.1% |
Investment income | $1,011,544 | 2.7% |
Bond proceeds | $0 | |
Royalties | $271,013 | 0.7% |
Rental property income | $0 | |
Net fundraising | $0 | |
Sales of assets | $1,153,027 | 3.0% |
Net inventory sales | $2,384 | 0.0% |
Other revenue | $1,381 | 0.0% |
Notable expenses | Percent of total expenses | |
Executive compensation | $1,089,407 | 4.4% |
Professional fundraising fees | $136,347 | 0.6% |
Other salaries and wages | $3,392,717 | 13.9% |
Other | ||
Total Assets | $49,452,511 | |
Total Liabilities | $2,320,549 | |
Net Assets | $47,131,962 |
Yes, and I just saw an article on it posted here about 30 min ago, am going to read it now.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3670891/posts
Troubling Questions Emerge About FBIs Strzok; Father Worked in Africa for Companies Linked to, Funded by CIA!
Peter Strzok Sr.. the father of the FBIs Peter Strzok, served 21 years in the Army before taking a post in Africa for Catholic Relief Services, a charity with bonafide international links to the CIA and funding from the United Nations. According to records, Strzok worked for CRS staring in 1981 and lived abroad with his family a young Peter in Africa. Prior to taking the position in Africa, the elder Strzok worked in Vietnam, the Middle East and specifically Iran for an unknown U.S. contractor.
Strzok stayed in Iran until Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was installed in 1979 in the hope of stabilizing the tumultuous region and political climate during the American hostage crisis as well, records show. After leaving Iran, Strzok took the African post with CRS. But it was not Strzoks first U.S.-backed mission in Iran. In a recent 2016 article in the Fayetteville Observer, he detailed an earlier mission in Iran as well as his navigating Russian influence in that country predating his private work in Iran by nearly two decades. Strzok wrote:
In 1965, I was an Army engineer captain assigned to the U.S. Military Mission to Iran. Fresh out of Persian language studies at Monterey, California, one of my jobs was to accept civic action schools being built from funds accrued from sales by Iran of food aid provided by the U.S. These schools were being built in border areas, concentrating on nomadic groups such as the Kurds, Balouch, Turkoman, Azeris and Afghans, under the theory that educated nomads tend toward sedentary living with reduced security concerns. One was built in Marivan, a Kurdish village hard up against the Iraqi border. In October 1965, I flew from Tehran, in a de Havilland Otter, to meet with contractors and Tehran Engineer District staff, to turn over the Marivan school for transfer to the government to Iran.
The program Strzok headed in Africa for CRS in the 1980s was funded by federal aid to and from USAID, records show. USAID maintains it is an independent aid organization, however its history is entwined and entangled deeply with the CIA. Just like Catholic Relief Services. Both organizations have embedded covert CIA operatives in international outposts to carry out operations ranging from intelligence gathering to covert Ops.
The CIA funds various covert operations through various front organizations including known CIA operations groups which funnel funds to various non-governmental agencies (NGOs) which then use such funds to achieve American intelligence objectives worldwide.
Often criticized for its involvement with the U.S. intelligence apparatus, CRS is a documented CIA-linked NGO. And USAID is the government-funded equivalent.
Excerpted. For full story go to link below!
Yup. Cohen's statement was extremely repulsive.
More power to them, they’re doing good work.
Judicial Watch does the job that Congress,DOJ,FBI,IG etc WILL NOT do.
.
Do you have a grudge against justice and openness?
Judicial watch has consistently been the stand-in consience of our criminal federal government.
.
Agree. Judicial Watch is awesome. This is outrageous behavior by Justice and the FBI. They need to be held accountable.
IMHO, JW has been one of the _most_ important and effective institutions in USA for forcing DC to come back under USConstitition. They wage war with the beast that lives therein on numerous fronts.
Do you have a grudge against justice and openness?
*********
Nope
Looks like swiss cheese.
With these clowns that could very well be the case.
Fits very well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.