Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strzok Ignored Evidence That Hillary’s Emails Were Sent to a Foreign Entity (IG Horowitz Too)
Independent Sentinel ^ | July 14, 2018 | S. Noble

Posted on 07/14/2018 7:34:46 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Rep. Louis Gohmert, a member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity. The FBI, specifically Strzok, did not follow-up.

And, the foreign entity wasn’t Russia.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) in 2016 Charles McCullough III found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

According to Gohmert, McCulloch sent his ICIG investigator Frank Rucker to present the findings to Strzok who knew he met with him. Conveniently, Strzok couldn’t remember what they talked about.

When Rucker spoke with Strzok, he nodded but was remarkably uninterested, Gohmert said.

The DoJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz received a call about it four times and never returned the calls. He’s the other DoJ official described as having an impeccable reputation, but he can’t seem to find bias when it slaps him in the face.

(Excerpt) Read more at independentsentinel.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 30000; anomaly; carterheavy; carterheavyind; china; chinesecompany; chinesehackers; clintonemails; emails; foreignentitu; foreignentity; frankrucker; gohmert; guilty; hillary; icig; icigwarning; industries; mcculloch; mcmillan; nongovserver; prc; rucker; server; strzok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: pepsionice

Seems like the Awan brothers had access to about everything, so I don’t think a stretch about Hillary. The Awans I think kept copies of servers, databases and looks like they, or one at least, has made some sort of deal so they have something.


21 posted on 07/14/2018 8:41:10 AM PDT by bcr100 (Its)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m sorry for posting this so often, but the DOJ and FBI are rogue agencies that are totally out of control.

Purge the damn corruption now.

Stalin like, it’s necessary.

5.56mm


22 posted on 07/14/2018 8:52:23 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

And yes, I know you have my phone number and address.

5.56mm


23 posted on 07/14/2018 8:54:36 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
Women who have affairs with married men tend to be a little touchy about this sort of thing being brought out in public.
24 posted on 07/14/2018 8:57:14 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
By the way why are the FOX babes so inflamed about Gohmert’s comments re Strzok’s adultery?

My guess (and it's only a guess) is that people who have had affairs freak out when reminded that they are liars and vow breakers.

25 posted on 07/14/2018 9:09:39 AM PDT by NutsOnYew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
Louie Gohmert’s claim about this IG report was brushed aside because the media focused on Gohmert’s comment regarding adulterous Strzok lying to his wife. By the way why are the FOX babes so inflamed about Gohmert’s comments re Strzok’s adultery? Dana Perino and Laura Ingrahm both were incensed. I thought women in general were against philandering husbands?

Because these women are stuck on stupid... and they get paid to be stupid on the 'air'.

26 posted on 07/14/2018 9:12:55 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Perino’s marital history—
Perino met her future husband, Peter McMahon, in August 1997.[4] McMahon, who is 18 years older than Perino, was born in England,[4] and is a businessman involved in the international marketing and sales of medical products.[citation needed] They were married in 1998.

Ingraham’s marital history-—
Laura Anne Ingraham (born June 19, 1963) is an American conservative television and radio .... Ingraham, who has never married, is a single parent of three children:


27 posted on 07/14/2018 9:24:27 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

“Ingraham, who has never married, is a single parent of three children”

Adopted by her.

She was dumped by her fiance when she discovered she had cancer, and underwent a double masectomy.


28 posted on 07/14/2018 9:41:21 AM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It didn’t fit the narrative.


29 posted on 07/14/2018 10:02:43 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Horowitz’ job was not to re-investigate the case, and he said so from the outset. His job was to investigated the conduct of the FBI and DOJ employees.

What?

Strzok's "conduct" was to ignore evidence that Hillary’s emails were sent to a foreign entity. Apparently Horowitz didn't investigate Strzok's "conduct" on that matter. In fact he ignored four phones calls about it.

30 posted on 07/14/2018 11:14:53 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Laura Ingraham was offended? I’m surprised. I thought she would have cheered on Louis Ghomert like I did. Bravo to him for stating the obvious!


31 posted on 07/14/2018 11:24:14 AM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Strzok and Horowitz are totally unbiased.


32 posted on 07/14/2018 2:51:21 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcr100

Pakistan... surely. If Pakistan had it, probably Iran & China got them too.


33 posted on 07/14/2018 4:09:16 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bcr100

That was my first thought, somebody set up email forwarding on the server. They got everything.

This is exactly why you have authorized servers and why Hillary should be in jail. She put our national security at grave risk.


34 posted on 07/14/2018 5:59:25 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It was a China company and the Chinese were getting everything real time:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3682851/posts


35 posted on 08/28/2018 7:01:23 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcr100

china


36 posted on 08/28/2018 8:33:08 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson