Question for the group; Does anyone see the irony in the fact that bogus FB ads and social media postings fall under the free speech clause of 1A and are not illegal? Is Mueller really seeing free speech as a crime? This could be a slippery slope.
I seem to recall a POTUS election where the left organized foreigners (Brits iirc) to email and snail mail American citizens to tell the Americans how the foreigners wanted Americans to vote.
The main purpose is to generate headlines.
You won't see evidence of this. The accused may as well be ghosts, assuming they exist at all. Everything else is National Security, don't ya know.
Rumor has it Mueller has the indictments for Snoopy, Charlie Brown, Linus, and Lucy ready to drop next week.
It falls under, American can hack every election on Earth and spend hundreds of millions to affect outcomes, but its madness for twelve Russians to play hacker on their computers.
I want to say this . The Mueller investigation has been and is feckless. They desperately seek to justify their failed efforts by making allegations they know will never have to be proven and will never be proven. the intended message is that the election of Trump was fraudulent. This is the second time they tried this trick. The first time the indicted Russian companies. One of the answered and demanded proof discovery and the case collapsed. Now they indict station chief intelligence officers in the Russian defense intelligence agency. That is like the CIA . What a joke.
Secondly. lets look at what they are saying happened. The assertion is that the American voter found out through the DNC emails that the DNC rigged the nomination against Bernie Sanders ,in favor of criminal hillary. Of Course, that is true. Did the American people not have a right to know the truth?
Julianne Assange is a key witness to who gave him the DNC emails. He is essential to the defense because he says it absolutely was not the Russian. In fact, the data was far too massive to be obtained on the internet and was delivered to Wikileaks on thumb drives. It was Wikileaks and only Wikileaks that showed the truth to the American people. I personally think it was meaningless because Bernie Sanders is just a communist clown and hillary was a criminal and the Americans rejected both of them very wisely.
Trump is not a party to this. Why is he still impugned by this sham investigation? This investigation is OVER!!
Trump should ignore this and make great deals with Russia like the Germans have done on natural gas ( except he wont take kick backs like merkle and her cabal apparently received_) .
In summary, the Rosenstien theater, that he knows he will never have to prove, is fabrication.
If twelve Russian military officers were stupid enough to leave their digital fingerprints out for Mueller to discover them, then they would not have the ability to hack a computer.
Does anyone wonder why, if a Russian buys a face book ad, it unerringly accomplishes its objective? As opposed to the geniuses running Hillary’s campaign who spent hundreds of millions of dollars on prime time ads that accomplished very little.
Schweizer explained the deep ties the Clintons have to Russia, specifically how in 2010 then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approved the sale and transfer of 20% of U.S. uranium output to the Russian government ...
_____________________________________________________
As part of just-inaugurated President Obamas new foreign policy to improve relations between the United States and Russia, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with Russias Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in March 2009. Meeting in her hotels Salon Panorama in Geneva, she presented him with a small gift box containing a bright red button symbolizing the Obama administrations desire to reset the relationship between the two governments.
Thus began an effort to transfer American technology to Russian President Vladimir Putins own Silicon Valley, called Skolkovo.
In a report released in late July by the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) entitled From Russia With Money, authors Stephen Bannon and Peter Schweitzer reviewed the long sordid history of the technology transfer from companies such as Google, Intel, and Cisco of hi-tech technology with useful military applications.
The report quoted warnings from the FBI and the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth that the transfer would work against American interests. Warned the U.S. Army:
[The reset would serve as] a vehicle for world-wide technology transfers to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.
It was clearly a quid pro quo arrangement: 17 of the 28 companies involved in the technology transfer gave millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation or to Bill Clinton for giving some speeches.
When those authors, both of whom are affiliated with Breitbart News, summed up their conclusions, one question remained: The GAI investigative report says its unclear how much, if any, money [John] Podesta made. Podesta, having served the Clintons for years, first as chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and then as counselor to President Obama and finally as Hillarys campaign chairman, deserved a payoff.
But it wasnt clear until the latest batch of e-mails provided by WikiLeaks went public last week that Americans now know. For his efforts Podesta received thousands of shares of common and preferred stock in one of the companies involved in the transfer. The fact came to light when WikiLeaks published e-mails Podesta sent to the company ordering it to transfer his shares to a shell corporation he had created a month earlier.
The e-mails included a letter Podesta wrote to the corporate secretary of that company instructing him to retitle 33,693 shares of preferred stock to Leonidio Holdings, LLC, a corporation that Podesta (or one of his staff) created using a Corporation Service Company to hide the shares from public view.
The company that gave Podesta the stock shares, Joule Unlimited, claims to be a producer of alternative energy technology that will eventually be able to produce energy that will be competitive with oil priced at $50 a barrel. It was a recipient of millions of Putins rubles as one of the gang of companies working to transfer American technology to Russia, one of Americas enemies.
As Schweizer told the New York Post in an interview in July:
The Clintons, they get their donations and speaking fees in the millions of dollars. The Russians get access to advanced US technology. The tech companies get special access to the Russian market and workforce .
All I ask is that people look at the money. Who made the deals, who benefited from the deals?
Thanks to WikiLeaks the people now know the name of at least one of those who participated in the deals and how he benefited from them: John Podesta, Hillarys campaign manager.
Former Senator Al DAmato (R-NY) dropped a bomb on Sunday Morning Futures this AM. DAmato told Maria Bartiromo that Hillary allowed Russia to take ownership of US uranium so they could sell it to Iran.
Hillary made it possible for the Russians to take control of one of our huge uranium producers and allow them to own the company, export the uranium and who do they sell the uranium to? Iran!
Now if people knew that and that the foundation as a result of that got $135 million. I think people would start saying, What?
Its true.
In January 2013, Pravda celebrated the Russian atomic energy agencys purchase of the company Uranium One in Canada.
That same company, Uranium One, owned uranium concessions in the United States. Because uranium is a strategically important commodity, the Russians would need approval from the Obama administration, including Hillarys State Department, before the purchase took place.
Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation in the run-up to State Department approval.
The Clintons took the cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clintons State Department. The Clintons hid the donations which is a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secreatary of State. (Via Breitbart)
The New York Times reported on the crooked deal in 2015.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium Ones chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And then theres this...
Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) told Greta Van Susteren the deal Hillary approved gave Putin ownership of 20 percent of US uranium and Russia sells uranium to unfriendly countries, including Iran.
______________________________________________________________
Remember those side deals Obama forged with Iran that were not part of the text of the official treaty? Now we are finding out some of the details.
Yesterday, the Washington Free Beacon reported that Iranian officials confirmed they have received at least $10 billion in cash, commodities, and assets from Washington since 2013. And that is likely a conservative estimate.
But cash is not the only thing the Islamic Republic of Iran is receiving for gracing us with their willingness to sign onto our own capitulation.
The AP is reporting that Russia, with the support of President Obama, is shipping Iran 116 metric tons of natural uranium.
While Iranian officials have obviously declined to disclose the use of such uranium, AP notes that this is enough to enrich weapons-grade uranium for nuclear bombs:
Despite present restrictions on its enrichment program, however, the amount of natural uranium is significant should Iran decide to keep it in storage, considering its potential uses once some limits on Tehrans nuclear activities start to expire in less than a decade.
David Albright, whose Institute of Science and International Security often briefs U.S. lawmakers on Irans nuclear program, says the shipment could be enriched to enough weapons-grade uranium for more than 10 simple nuclear bombs, depending on the efficiency of the enrichment process and the design of the nuclear weapon. ...
________________________________________________________________
I find it curious that Rod Rosenstein decided to drop this the day before President Trump was to meet with Putin.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton facilitated a uranium exchange with Russian law enforcement by former FBI Director (and current chief Deep State inquisitor) Robert Mueller.
The exchange was exposed via a recent Wikileaks publication of a secret cable between Hillarys State Department and the Russian embassy.
Hillary sent Mueller to Moscow with orders to turn over a 10 gram sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) which was obtained during a shadowy 2006 nuclear sting operation conducted in the Georgian Republic.
The ostensible reason for the transfer was to engender further trust between Russian and American law enforcement in the area of nuclear materials and to learn more about how to trace nuclear materials.
But when it comes to Hillary and Russian uranium interests, the shady Uranium One deal cannot pass unnoted.
There still has been no real investigation into how Hillary gave permission for a Russian company to acquire a quarter of the North American uranium reserves after Russian interests poured hundreds of millions into the Clinton Foundation and gave Bill Clinton six figure speaking fees.
At the very least, this exchange raises serious questions about the ability of Robert Mueller to do his job as special prosecutor on the Russian collusion charges since he already has connections to major figures in Russian law enforcement.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanlibertypac.com ...
_____________________________________________________________
We all know that the Russian Collusion investigation is nothing but a game to try and distract the population from actually caring about the day to day running of the country, but the charade has gone too far and some serious questions need to be asked; most especially of Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
WikiLeaks has put out a document that details then FBI Director Muellers itinerary on his visit to Russia to deliver 10 grams of Enriched Uranium.
One more time for those who missed it
Mueller hand delivered Highly Enriched Uranium to the Russian government!
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
It's amazing she survived the ordeal, though it appears they did infect her with pneumonia or Parkinson's Disease ... or maybe just rank stupidity ... while she was being held in captivity.
Oh, my. You mean the Russians have secret intelligence agencies and officers who (gasp) SPY on us? HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN GOING ON?!!
Damned good thing Mueller stumbled on to this. Seriesly, we need to nip this in the bud.
Nine paragraphs deep into the article:
“The indictment also does not allege that any vote tallies were altered by hacking.”
An UTTERLY MEANINGLESS “indictment”!
Rosenstein is counting on never having to prove any of this, just like Mueller’s earlier indictments. They know Russia isn’t going to turn them over. Just for show.
And of course it gives them an excuse not to turn over whatever “evidence” they may have. The old “ongoing investigation” that will never be over trick.
It would be funny if any Russians suspected admit they had access to a US “bathroom server” and that they had contact with Imran Awan. What would the liberals say to THAT?
These are 12 Russian military intelligence officers (GRU). They are just following orders and will never be extradited to the US. This is just more happy horsesh*t from Mueller who wants to up the number of indictments from his investigation.
...aimed at influencing public opinion...
Isn’t that the very nature of a political campaign??