Kavanaugh seems solid on stopping the invasion of the US and getting around regulations for hiring non-citizens. I'd think he's the better choice. JMHO
I would not pick a judge on a singular issue, be it immigration or otherwise. The federalist society folks would not disagre with Kavanaugh on his position on the misuse of the H1B visa, and just because a judge who is a federalist member, like Amy Barrett, was not siting in on that decision, it bears less weight on how she might have ruled than does her avowed federlist principles, a good part of which is against the judiciary making itself into a superlegislature.
That Kavanaugh is really part of the Bush family stable, clerked for Kennedy and how broadly he sought to stretch the grounds for impeaching Clinton (which I never agreed with) do not make my heart warm with positive anticipation for Trump. I think he could be a Trojan horse against Trump at SCOTUS if the Dems manage to take the house and vote for impeachment. That the media is now all pushing Kavanaugh tells me the deep state is very much behind him.
Where is Kavanaugh on other immigration issues besides the H1B. Is that one issue enough, as to the rest of the Constiutional issues on immigration. The case really not “constitutionally” difficult as the employer was very clearly abusing the very demands of the H1B, which require that the H1B recipient brings “specialized knoweldge” the employer could not otherwise obtain, and the employer in the case was hiring for kitchen help. How does that simple matter make Kavanagh a Conservative legal night in shining armour on immigration. Do not forget he is really part of the Bush family stable, with background and experience with the father and the son. No friends of Trump are they. Is Kavanaugh a Trojan horse being wrapped up by the deep state and the media now as a “gift” to Trump??? Why are so many Conservatives buying the promo??
What you want is not a judge that is solid on this issue or that issue. But a judge that is solid on obeying the law including our constitution. And Barrett is solid on that.
Illegal immigration and the Bill of Rights are the two biggies for me.
Call me crazy, but any brilliant person can be a jurist par excellence. What I want on the court is someone not buyable, someone who has a moral core.
Kavenaugh lied and protected the Clinton machine from being murder suspects. That makes him not fit no matter what great legal genius he has come up with since.
Check out this transcript and see what he did to Patrick Knowlton who stopped to urinate at Ft. Marcy Park that fateful day when Vince Foster was found deep in the muddy woods with not a speck of dirt on his shoes.
http://www.fbicover-up.com/miguel-rodriguez.html
It seems to me like lots of FReepers will accept any immoral behavior as long as the person espouses our politics.
Everyone on Fox News is fêting the great Constitutionalist, Alan Dershowitz, and it doesn’t bother anyone that he had multiple sexual encounters with a 16 year old girl. They just love his anti-left politics.
It’s just not enough for the Supreme Court. We don’t need someone indebted to the Clintons or who can be swayed away from the truth with threats or whatever made him lie back then.