Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Faces Prison on Child Porn Charges for Sexy Photos of 17-Year-Old Girlfriend When He was 20
reason.com ^ | Jul. 5, 2018 1:29 pm | Robby Soave

Posted on 07/05/2018 3:25:28 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments

...FBI agents later interviewed Marrero's ex-girlfriend, who confirmed that she was 17 at the time the pictures were taken. A conviction will force Marrero to register as a sex offender and could land him in prison for up to 30 years. According to the U.S. Department of Justice's guide to federal child pornography law, "a first time offender convicted of producing child pornography...face fines and a statutory minimum of 15 years to 30 years maximum in prison." Under Ohio law, which also sets the cutoff for child pornography at 18, Marrero would have faced between six months and eight years. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: childpornography; fbi; pedophiles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-186 next last
To: TheConservator

.
Right on the money!
.


81 posted on 07/05/2018 5:23:19 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Actually, it was/is child pornography by definition. She was 17 and under the age of majority. While she may have consented, by statute she was unable to give consent.

The old line 15 will get you 20 is still operative. And when I was 16, I would never consider fornicating with a girl who was 15. Same applies here. He should have never considered taking a naked picture of his under the age of majority girlfriend even if she let him.


82 posted on 07/05/2018 5:23:40 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“Makes no sense at all.”

Ditto. It makes no sense at all to post outrage when you have been suckered by a click-bait article.


83 posted on 07/05/2018 5:24:37 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

.
This is many orders of magnitude beyond absurd.
.


84 posted on 07/05/2018 5:25:14 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Trumpisourlastchance

I guess you are for allowing pedophiles open access to the kiddies ...


85 posted on 07/05/2018 5:25:38 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

.
Well, now I have been posted to by a click bait troll!

My collection is complete.


86 posted on 07/05/2018 5:26:42 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments

In Ohio, the age of consent for sex is 16 years old. This means that, generally speaking, someone who is 16 can consent to sex with an older person, no matter what the age difference is between them. Sex with someone under the age of 16 in Ohio is presumptively statutory rape.

Ohio’s age of consent law currently only applies to heterosexual sexual encounters. That is because Ohio still has black-letter law that makes all homosexual conduct illegal, regardless of age. However, such laws have been rendered unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, so long as the parties are consenting adults acting only in private settings. Because of this, it is not clear what Ohio’s age of consent is for homosexual conduct, although it may be assumed that it is the same as the age for consent to heterosexual acts.

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/ohio-age-of-consent-lawyers.html

If the legal age of consent in Ohio to have sex is 16, then how can that 16 yo be considered a child?


87 posted on 07/05/2018 5:27:29 PM PDT by eastforker (All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“This is many orders of magnitude beyond absurd.

Totally absurd to put your ex’s explicit photos up on a computer owned by a child porn trafficker who was convicted of having sex with a child


88 posted on 07/05/2018 5:29:10 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Bill Gates fault — he put the cameras in the damn phones.


89 posted on 07/05/2018 5:30:43 PM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
I guess you are for allowing pedophiles open access to the kiddies

Why? Are you getting a little worked up?

90 posted on 07/05/2018 5:31:11 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“My collection is complete.”

You are aware that this thread is a discussion of child porn collections ...


91 posted on 07/05/2018 5:31:17 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
.
The Biblical age at which a woman is adult and to be married off is 13.

Our statutes are violating the first amendment’s Free exercise clause at a minimum.

Actually they are completely interfering with things that are nowhere near government's business.
.

92 posted on 07/05/2018 5:31:45 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

You deflected but didn’t deny.


93 posted on 07/05/2018 5:32:13 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments; Vaquero

Sign the petitiln to fire Sessions, Rosenstein, and Wray:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/fire-jeff-sessions-rod-rosenstein-christopher-wray-and-purge-doj-and-fbi-headquarters-corruption

Send the link to friends. Post on facebook and twitter. Make it go viral!


94 posted on 07/05/2018 5:33:49 PM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Fire Sessions!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
.
You could not be more wrong!

Its about statutory and judicial impropriety.

Of course we never expect you to grasp these complex ideas, and you have yet to disappoint!

95 posted on 07/05/2018 5:35:05 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Wipe the flop sweat off your forehead, Gramps.

Try to figure out who you are talking to.

Or maybe you got more problems than sweat, hey?

Short of tissues?

96 posted on 07/05/2018 5:35:29 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables
.
Petition Signed!

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/fire-jeff-sessions-rod-rosenstein-christopher-wray-and-purge-doj-and-fbi-headquarters-corruption

97 posted on 07/05/2018 5:37:48 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“You could not be more wrong!
Its about statutory and judicial impropriety.”

And where is the impropriety you assert these pedophiles are suffering from?


98 posted on 07/05/2018 5:37:57 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

.
He’s ‘short’ of a lot!
.


99 posted on 07/05/2018 5:38:51 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

A twenty year old taking consensual sexual explicit photos of a seventeen year old girlfriend or boyfriend should never have been classified as child porn.


100 posted on 07/05/2018 5:39:02 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson