Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cpdiii

Actually, it was/is child pornography by definition. She was 17 and under the age of majority. While she may have consented, by statute she was unable to give consent.

The old line 15 will get you 20 is still operative. And when I was 16, I would never consider fornicating with a girl who was 15. Same applies here. He should have never considered taking a naked picture of his under the age of majority girlfriend even if she let him.


82 posted on 07/05/2018 5:23:40 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Ouderkirk

.
This is many orders of magnitude beyond absurd.
.


84 posted on 07/05/2018 5:25:14 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

Bill Gates fault — he put the cameras in the damn phones.


89 posted on 07/05/2018 5:30:43 PM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson