In other words, if something is real then science can ultimately reproduce it. This is what science is.
Evolution is not real. Think of it as analogous to all talk and no action.
You have no clue about the reality of our world or of science
You producce Fake Posts.
Made up
Untrue
Your spouting drivel again.
>>In other words, if something is real then science can ultimately reproduce it. This is what science is.
Evolution is not real. Think of it as analogous to all talk and no action.<<
You should stop. You are showing your ignorance and embarrassing yourself. TToE is used extensively in immunology. Have you never heard of how viruses adapt?
Pest control directly applies TToE in trying to keep ahead of how pests adapt to insecticides and of course in how to adapt produce to fight them off.
Those are off the top of my head.
You do not know science. You probably think Gravity and The Theory of Gravity are the same thing.
You should not opine on subjects on which you have no knowledge.
No. I'm not the first to point out that you don't know what you are talking about.
Does geology require that we reproduce the Earth? Silly.
Experiments and studies have to be reproducible. A theory does not require there be experiments to test it, it only requires that there be tests. It must make predictions. Those predictions may be about things we'll find in the world. Evolution does this. It makes predictions about what we should find with regard to fossils, genetics and other aspects of the world. If it weren't true then any of those predictions may falsify the theory if what we find doesn't support it. It hasn't worked that way. The things we find all support the theory.