Posted on 07/05/2018 9:03:19 AM PDT by PubliusMM
Contrary to what the liberal media and open-borders advocates say, immigrants are not owed same constitutional protections as regular Americans
(Excerpt) Read more at lifezette.com ...
It is not really foreigner nationals, but non-resident foreign nationals without a visa. If you have a H1B, an L1, or a green card, then you would be entitled to due process, since the US has chosen to admit you and has granted you certain rights.
Or even irregular ones................
Gee. Like Roe vs. Wade. Settled Law.
(which is, I am sure, exactly what you meant!)
I agree with that decision, but it’s going to confuse a lot of people who are being told otherwise.
That is a very dangerous road to go down, and it looks like we are on it now :(
This is the only ruling they could make. You cant possibly facilitate millions of illegals getting a court date per year. Who knew?
The Left simply wanted to bring border control to a screeching halt.
Hmm, is there a pattern building here?
If its anti-U. S., they think its best.
winning bigtime ping
Not just that, but the 14th’s citizenship clause was written to expressly exclude the children of individuals not formally under our Jurisdiction from receiving citizenship.
There should have never been any “anchor babies” ... at least not from any illegal alien.
In Plyler v Doe.,The Court wrote....
“The Fourteenth Amendment provides that “[no] State shall . . . deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Appellants argue at the outset that undocumented aliens, because of their immigration status, are not “persons within the jurisdiction” of the State of Texas, and that they therefore have no right to the equal protection of Texas law. We reject this argument. Whatever his status under the immigration laws, an alien is surely a “person” in any ordinary sense of that term. Aliens, even aliens whose presence in this country is unlawful, have long been recognized as “persons” guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.”
Yep
This anchor babies notion will likely become the next major issue on this front.
It seems to me the test should be the allegiance of the parent(s). If they owe no allegiance to the US, then neither should the child be considered a citizen.
But a lower court ruled that adults with kids caught sneaking across the border (which is illegal) cannot be separated.
Separating them is unconstitutional.
And the cases cited in the article identify that the administrative processes authorized by Congress are “due process” for non citizens or anyone here not on a valid visa.
You are either a welcome guest or a trespassing intruder. Guests get treated as one of the family; uninvited trespassers can get treated a little (or a lot) more rudely...
bttt
So . . .
Congress passes a law that describes what “due process” is for illegal alien invaders.
Immediate expulsion from the country.
That should fix it.
It’s simply the text of a decision by the Supreme Court.
No duh
Obama cant prove citizenship, therefore Barack Hussein Obama is an illegal alien with fake US documents.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.