Posted on 07/03/2018 6:43:38 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen
By now everyone has reported about ABC journalist Brian Ross and his Producer Rhonda Swartz resigning from the network. However, almost everyone pointing back to Ross’s fake news report on Michael Flynn in December; and almost no-one is pointing out the more obvious motive for the resignation.
Brian Ross was almost guaranteed to be “Reporter 4” in the federal indictment of Senate former senior senate intelligence committee staffer James Wolfe. The notorious Senate Intelligence “leaker”.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Why would Brian Ross resign over being reporter 4? That would be a resume enhancer.
The walls be crumbling.
Ross is scum.
One POS media propagandist gone.
947,295 more to go.
</sarcasm>
When that story about Don Jr. came out where the date of the incriminating email was 07 SEP instead of the actual 17 SEP, I knew that was a CI OP! Good one!
Conservative Treehouse seems to be the only media source that actually digs behind the scene.
The rest of the media simply report on the press release given them from the guilty party.
Conservative Treehouse seems to be the only media source that actually digs behind the scene?
Sharyl Attkisson does a great job:
1 Jul: The Hill: Rosenstein conflicts undermine legitimacy of Mueller’s investigation
By Sharyl Attkisson
In his recent testimony to Congress, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein undoubtedly intended to sound reassuring. “I am quite confident,” he proclaimed, “about my conduct throughout this investigation”...
Rosenstein recommended that President Trump fire FBI Director James Comey — then handpicked Robert Mueller to investigate why Trump fired Comey. It’s akin to you or I being allowed to hire the guy who’s going judge our own actions. Not only that, Rosenstein’s pick — Mueller — is a longtime colleague of Comey’s, whose own behavior was found to be “extraordinary and insubordinate,” according to the recent DOJ’s inspector general report...
Rosenstein is in the position to decide whether to pursue criminal charges against the man who provided the anti-Trump “oppo” research used for the wiretaps that Rosenstein approved: Christopher Steele. But implicating Steele — an FBI source — could call into question the actions of Rosenstein himself and his colleagues. Rosenstein has taken no public action on a criminal referral against Steele sent to him almost six months ago by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).
Under Rosenstein, the Department of Justice and FBI have withheld and improperly redacted information Congress requested...
Lastly, during his testimony, Rosenstein assured Congress that he would certainly discuss with Mueller if there were any conflicts of interest.
Don’t worry. He’ll take care of it.
http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/395080-rosenstein-conflicts-undermine-legitimacy-of-muellers-investigation
Brian was in my J school class at Iowa.
He’s from Waterloo, IA.
Maybe Dhannel 7 will come calling...
Brian was in my J school class at Iowa.
He’s from Waterloo, IA.
Maybe Channel 7 will come calling...
May the Swartz be with him.
Reporter #3 was hosted and honored by the Obama’s in the 2016 White House Cor-despondence dinner while she was a student at GWU. https://gwtoday.gwu.edu/first-recipient-george-washington-university-white-house-correspondents-association-scholarship
Evidently a nurturing relationship was developed into a leak provider in the democrat media incest party.
I think Sharyl Attkisson and Sarah Carter do a pretty straight, factual job at reporting the under belly of the Deep State.
Sarah Carter = Sara Carter
To be MOre accurate, CTH is the only rag that just invents speculation and prints it as if it is proved fact.
The vast majority of Bradmans nonsense never comes to pass. FR readers have documented how nonsensical CTH predictions are. Bradman is a nut. Citing him as a source is not recommended.
Why would ABC can Brian Ross because he had an inside source? They wouldnt.
Ross was canned because he finally embarrassed the network enough by his phony stories. Just like NBC canned him years ago for the phony car explosion story.
Sundance has done tremendous work on the Obama spy scandal.
If you count the number of times he has been wrong. But dont expect mark bradman aka sundunce to admit it. When his fanciful theories never come to pass you just never hear of them again. As if they never existed!
If you think he has done such great work on the obama scandals, please explain bradmans repeated therories that:
All the FBI dirtbags like are actually white hats working to bring the obama clinton criminals to justice.
Rosenstein and sessions are white hats doing the same.
Wray is a white hat doing the same.
The Big Ugly ( massive arrests of obama crimnals) is next week ( several months now overdue).
The bottom line is that Bradman has not been correct on very many of his analysis. Start keeping track for yourself.
Better yet, read the CTH posters over at CTH cult. If that doesnt set you straight , nothing will.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.