Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The ‘Biden Rule’ and the ‘McConnell Rule’ are Distractions
nationalreview.com ^ | 6/28/18 | CHARLES C.W. COOKE

Posted on 06/29/2018 10:54:57 AM PDT by drpix

There’s a lot of chatter about “The McConnell Rule.” There shouldn’t be, because it’s immaterial. The Senate gets to decide what to do with judicial nominations; everything else is just shouting. In 2016, the Senate was controlled by Republicans. A Democratic president sent that Senate a nomination it didn’t like, and that Senate decided not to act on it... This decision was dressed up by Mitch McConnell as “the Biden Rule.”

In 2018, the Senate still gets to decide. Now that Justice Kennedy has retired, the Senate, which is still run by Republicans, will be sent a nominee. If it likes that nominee, it’ll vote to seat him...

Everything else is just shouting.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biden; dems; obstructionofjustice; scotus; trump
Besides, any honest observer of Biden, for any period of time, must admit that he has only one Rule:

IF IT BREATHS GROPE IT!


1 posted on 06/29/2018 10:54:57 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drpix

The Democrat Party does not care about any rules, laws, precedents, policies, or procedures — unless the application thereof gives their Party more power.


2 posted on 06/29/2018 11:02:59 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The Democrat Party does not care about any rules, laws, precedents, policies, or procedures — unless the application thereof gives their Party more power.

Wonder when the gop-e will figure that out and respond accordingly.

3 posted on 06/29/2018 11:07:46 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

We can thank McConnell for not seating Merrick Garland.


4 posted on 06/29/2018 11:32:40 AM PDT by Luke21 (p til)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: drpix

Schumer’s ploy to couch McConnel’s decision to proceed in “an election year” as hypocracy fails because this election is not a national presidential election that McConnel cited to not proceed with Obama’s nomination to replace Scalia.


5 posted on 06/29/2018 11:33:10 AM PDT by vigilence (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

He did manage to get that right.


6 posted on 06/29/2018 11:37:16 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vigilence

People need to be very careful here that we don’t box ourselves in by saying “it’s not a presidential election year!”.

Because there is a distinct possibility another spot opens up in 2020 and we absolutely need to fill that one too without waiting for the results in November.


7 posted on 06/29/2018 12:41:53 PM PDT by KyCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: drpix

[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/ip8oyp.jpg[/IMG]


8 posted on 06/29/2018 1:16:44 PM PDT by yodalego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson