Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN. Wow!
Real Donald Trump twitter ^ | June 26, 2018 | President Trump

Posted on 06/26/2018 8:22:06 AM PDT by SMGFan

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN. Wow!


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 3rdthread; bordersecurity; lawsuit; ruling; scotus; travalbanupheld; travelban; trumpscotus; trumptravelban; trumptweet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Thank you Justice Kennedy for your vote. Please retire now?
1 posted on 06/26/2018 8:22:06 AM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Kennedy runs the country from his seat on this ultra-politicized court.


2 posted on 06/26/2018 8:23:55 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Now add Central American countries.


3 posted on 06/26/2018 8:24:11 AM PDT by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

They only thing that is wow about it is that it was 5-4 and not 9-0.

The activists need to go right now.


4 posted on 06/26/2018 8:24:24 AM PDT by chris37 ("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Now add Central American countries.


5 posted on 06/26/2018 8:24:38 AM PDT by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

The 4 seem to compare this to putting the Japanese in internment camps back in WW2. It is fun watching the meltdown.


6 posted on 06/26/2018 8:25:58 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Correct.


7 posted on 06/26/2018 8:26:56 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Hmmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

It should be 9-0.
It’s written right in the Constitution.
Every Justice who didn’t agree knows it is the law but they don’t ‘like’ it.


8 posted on 06/26/2018 8:27:41 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Yeah, and Roberts took them down directly in the majority opinion.


9 posted on 06/26/2018 8:28:13 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Hmmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

What this means to me is that we have 4 Supreme Court Justices that clearly do not understand the Constitution. They also do not understand law, because no Civil Rights act can displace the original intent of the Constitution which gave immigration power and national border protection to the Executive Branch. Sadly, 4 Justices need to be removed because they stand on the Highest Court, but don’t support the US Constitution or law.


10 posted on 06/26/2018 8:28:47 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Excellent! I predict more exploding heads and fewer exploding backpacks.


11 posted on 06/26/2018 8:30:04 AM PDT by Jaxter (Pro Aris et Focis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

If you think the dems are going nuts now, wait until RBG is up for replacement.


12 posted on 06/26/2018 8:30:05 AM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chris37

The Supreme Court actually managed to conclude 1 + 1 = 2.

Pretty soon they may be able to figure out more complicated math. :-)


13 posted on 06/26/2018 8:32:28 AM PDT by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: toast

Oh, she is not up for replacement.
She is there for the long term.
If liberals believed in God they’d be praying for her.


14 posted on 06/26/2018 8:33:04 AM PDT by SMGFan (Sarah Michelle Gellar is on twitter @SarahMGellar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy
The 4 seem to compare this to putting the Japanese in internment camps back in WW2. It is fun watching the meltdown.

Japanese who were living here as compared with others who have been trying to enter.


15 posted on 06/26/2018 8:33:04 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pete Dovgan

They understand it fine, but they willingly violate their oath to uphold it. Impeach.


16 posted on 06/26/2018 8:34:03 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chris37

scary and predictable that 4 voted the president can’t do this.

This was a chance for Trump to have an andy jackson moment. From the first case in hawaii, he should have said the courts have no justification in national security and immigration and ignored the court action. He should have enforced the order immediately. If it was a serious issue it required action 14 months ago when he issued his restriction.

The narrowness of the margin is an indication that our security is in the hands of judges and not the CIC.


17 posted on 06/26/2018 8:34:08 AM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Build Kate's Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The fact it is not a 9-0 decision bodes very badly for America.

Clear and easily understandable language in the legislation was simply ignored by four justices.


18 posted on 06/26/2018 8:34:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz (What America needs is more Hogg control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Justice breyer was joined by the 3 women justices in opposition.
Not one of the 4 seems to know what the Presidents job is or how a Countries laws and borders work.


19 posted on 06/26/2018 8:34:35 AM PDT by VicVanleeuwenhoek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete Dovgan

The ones voting in the minority should all be impeached.


20 posted on 06/26/2018 8:34:55 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson