Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

The question I have, is how are they going to draw the line between looking like a child-like features and adult features. They are going to need specific characteristics.


5 posted on 06/14/2018 3:36:12 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

“The question I have, is how are they going to draw the line between looking like a child-like features and adult features.”

All they need to do is include a tag that says:

“This sex doll is guaranteed to {appear to} be 18 years or older”.


10 posted on 06/14/2018 3:44:42 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

Agree. The concept of such a “doll” is horrid, but this is similar to an “assault weapon.”

Let’s consider if this law targeted devices favored by women. Can Congress ban “dolls” with appendages that are smaller than some amount because that’s the same as a woman having sex with a child?

Typical politician election-year “feelgood” legislation.

My view is that this is the first step, with the ultimate goal of making any device of this kind that would be targeted toward men illegal, while keeping the sex robots for women legal.

The first salvo in making MGTOW illegal.


19 posted on 06/14/2018 4:05:58 PM PDT by HombreSecreto (Iron Maiden? EXCELLENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson