Posted on 06/13/2018 7:46:30 AM PDT by yoe
Edited on 06/13/2018 8:01:38 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Fresh off his summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Donald Trump returns to Washington on Wednesday to face what may be the biggest threat to his presidency -- Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
Now, Mueller is intent on quickly resolving a central issue with Trump
(Excerpt) Read more at bloombergquint.com ...
You mean, summon him, interview him and when he refuses to answer questions fire him for insubordination.
Justice Roberts has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.
Question 1: Why have you not question Hillary Clinton about the $145 million bribe she took from the Canadian company that was a front for the Russians.
Has Mueller questioned Hillary, John Podesta, or McCain on their known roles in Russian collusion?
Has an underlying crime been identified in order for this investigation to proceed?
Has the DNC server, which was supposedly hacked by Russians, been forensically investigated? Has the Seth Rich murder been investigated for its connections with Russian collusion?
If not, what is the legal basis for interviewing the president when it has already been stated that he is not the subject of the investigation?
The most Mueller is entitled to, if there is even any legitimacy to his job, is to send over a list of questions he would appreciate if the president could help him with.
I’m actually FOR trump to do a Mueller Interview.
That is, Trump Interviewing Mueller.
Then Firing him.
Then bring him up on charges of Treason, Conspiracy to commit Treason, Sedition, Violating the civil rights of some of the people he has investigated.
Etc.
“(No person) shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself”
Mueller is conducting a criminal investigation. It would actually be illegal for Mueller to violate Trump’s Constitutional rights if he tried to compel Trump in any way. Trump has made it clear that he believes it to be a perjury trap. The President’s counsel should put it in writing and give constructive notice that serving a subpoena would be a criminal violation of the President’s rights. Threatening impeachment would also be illegal compulsion.
FAKE NEWS
And not done under oath.
A Bloomberg fantasy.
He cannot force an interview. There is no crime proven to exist ANYWHERE. If Mueller could point to a bank robbery on a certain day, and prove Trump knew something, he could probably get an interview...maybe.
But you can’t force an interview because you want to DISCOVER if a crime has ever happened.
Flip him the bird and ignore him. Better yet, just fire him. It’s time.
Impeachment has always been easy in the House. The Bolshies only need 25 Rinos to bring charges. What the charges will be is the question, we hate Trump is not enough. There is no way the Senate can get 67 votes. jOkeass could, and, should, have been impeached with a Republican House and Senate. But, again, there was no way they were going to get 67 votes in the Senate.
Are you willing to find out if there are enough RINO swamp Senators to vote Aye for impeachment? I’m not, because I believe there are enough of them chomping at the bit to eliminate the threat his Presidency is to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.