Posted on 06/13/2018 7:09:42 AM PDT by reaganaut1
Berlin A brutal murder case has gripped Germany: On June 6 the body of a 14-year-old girl, Susanna Maria Feldmann, was found in Wiesbaden. She had been raped and strangled. Two days later her alleged assailant, Ali Bashar, a 20-year-old asylum seeker from Iraq, was apprehended in Iraqi Kurdistan, where he had fled. He reportedly confessed to the murder.
The case is just the latest in a string of murders and assaults by asylum seekers against women in Germany. In October 2016, Maria Ladenburger, a 19-year-old university student, was raped and killed by an Afghan asylum seeker. In December 2017, Mia Valentin, a 15-year-old girl, was stabbed to death in a drugstore by her ex-boyfriend, an Afghan migrant.
The cases have added fuel to the far rights fiery anti-immigrant rhetoric. And it has created a dilemma for Germanys liberal feminists: How can they fight against violence without supporting anti-immigrant resentments? Or to put it even more bluntly: Is it even possible to defend pluralism and womens rights at the same time in Germany today?
Violence against women committed by immigrant men first became a topic of debate after hundreds of women were sexually harassed and abused by groups of young men, most of whom were immigrants from North African countries, at Colognes main train station on New Years Eve in 2015. Since then there has been a steady drumbeat of stories, ranging from harassment in the streets to rape and murder, across Germany.
The far right has exploited these cases to support its call to defend Western culture against Islamization. Men from Muslim societies generally hold negative and denigrating images of women, the far right claims, and these hideous crimes make clear how much of a threat they are to the Occident in general and to women in particular.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
A LOT of these “asylum seekers” end up VACATIONING back in the country they claimed asylum from... with those vacations paid for by the governments that granted them asylum.
Don’t worry the German feminists will use these statistics to bolster their arguments for abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy. Thereby making it a legitimate issue and not a concession to the “Far Right” beliefs. That will remove any dilemma and bring attention back to where it belongs.
> Similar to the Bill Clinton rape dilemma. <
Good observation. Bill’s supporters mixed in a denial of the facts with a robust kill-the-messenger strategy.
We are seeing the same thing in Western Europe today. These Muslim rapists and terrorists are all “lone wolves”. And anyone who tries to connect the obvious dots is a Nazi.
Liberals have turned ignoring the elephant in the room into an art form.
The dilemma is all in between their ears: that white men aren’t as bad as they thought...but they still can’t stop thinking it. :)
It’s telling that they are not allowing comments for this article. I imagine they would be pretty damning.
You wanted them, biytches! You paraded around with signs saying that they are really nice people. You are getting what you deserve. Go visit Malmo Sweden and see what feminist politicians bring you.
https://www.steynonline.com/8700/sea-change
From the comments:
I recently returned from a Danube River cruise and visits to a couple of friends in Germany. Admittedly, prosperous, middle-aged and older, Germans on a riverboat and two retired German Army officers and their wives are not what you’d call a random sample of the population. But they were - to put it mildly - outspokenly uneasy about Muslim immigration. One of my buddies talked about a conversation he had with a young man who was wearing a T-shirt with “Morocco” emblazoned on it - who said what a wonderful country it is and how he goes back to visit twice a year. But he stays in Germany, where he gets a monthly stipend and can spend his time working out at a gym and picking up women. It was enough to make my friend vote AfD, the allegedly neo-Nazi party.
> German women are learning that hairy legs & armpits and bad body odor are no deterrent to Muzzie scumbag goat f***ers. <
When the Soviet Army entered defeated eastern Germany in 1945, many German women used makeup to make it appear like they had smallpox. It was a desperate attempt to avoid rape.
It is beyond bizarre that such techniques might have to be considered again.
Worked for England. Kind of.
Thanks reaganaut1. It would be much less of a problem if the "refugees" targeted German feminists -- the problem would solve itself after a couple of years.
The Far Right has exploited these cases
To filth like the New York Times everyone who isn’t a communist is the “far right”.
You quoted the British answer to that question.
Dilemma? Dilemma? The fact that feminists have a “dilemma” over this shows that their positions are fraudulent and hypocritical.
> To filth like the New York Times everyone who isnt a communist is the far right. <
it is also worth noting that the New York Times, etc. never uses the term “far left”. It’s never far-left Venezuelan President Maduro, for example. It’s always just Venezuelan President Maduro.
It’s not just foolish, it’s insane to believe when one allows poisonous snakes inside their house that they won’t get bitten
The amazing thing here is that the NYT is allowing reporting on the Muslim rape, sexual harassment, and murder problem in Germany caused by Merkel’s “refugees.” You know it’s gotten bad when the left-wing “press” doesn’t even try to cover it up anymore.
Feminists are fine with rape. They consider all men rapists, except the ones they have emasculated. They will, however, have one hell of a time sissifying the Muzzie hoardes. More likely is the simple truth that extreme male domination reduces feminazis to submissive sex slaves.
Which side should I choose?
This is just a "far right claim"? More like an absolute fact of their nature.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.