To: IC Ken
My wish would be Tom Fitton as a replacement. Tom Fitton is not an attorney.
16 posted on
06/12/2018 2:24:27 PM PDT by
JohnG45
To: JohnG45
evidently, neither is Sessions!
To: JohnG45
All the better.
But Rosenstein just put himself in a precarious situation. If he does follow through with his threat I believe Trump has indisputable cause for firing Rosenstein.
22 posted on
06/12/2018 2:29:28 PM PDT by
Fhios
(Atlas shrugged, Sessions yawned.)
To: JohnG45
Tom Fitton for Supreme Court.
46 posted on
06/12/2018 3:49:04 PM PDT by
ptsal
( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
To: JohnG45
I don’t think being a lawyer is a requirement for Attorney General.
49 posted on
06/12/2018 5:34:32 PM PDT by
Ouderkirk
(Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
To: JohnG45
not a legal requirement but politically unlikely
To: JohnG45
“Tom Fitton is not an attorney.”
Serious question: does the AG have to be an attorney? I assumed for years that SCOTUS members had to be attorneys, but I was wrong. In any case, Fitton is a bulldog, and that’s what we need.
To: JohnG45; IC Ken
Do you have to be an attorney?
61 posted on
06/13/2018 4:33:58 AM PDT by
a little elbow grease
(Zip ties and duct tape are far more productive than pussy hats and #metoo tweets)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson