Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court upholds Phoenix anti-discrimination law over gay wedding invitations
NBC Snooooze ^ | June 8, 2018

Posted on 06/08/2018 1:05:19 PM PDT by Ciaphas Cain

PHOENIX — An Arizona appeals court on Thursday upheld a Phoenix anti-discrimination law that makes it illegal for businesses to refuse service to same-sex couples because of religion.

The ruling comes days after the U.S. Supreme Court sided with a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The high court found Monday that a Colorado civil rights commission showed anti-religious bias when it ruled against Jack Phillips for refusing to make the cake at his Masterpiece Cakeshop.

(SNIP)

The three-judge panel said a stationery store that includes the customized design of wedding event merchandise is not “entitled to First Amendment free speech protections.”

“The case before us is one of a blanket refusal of service to the LGBTQ community,” the judges said.

Phoenix expanded the ordinance in 2013 to include protections against discrimination and bias based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brushandnib; homosexualagenda; velvetmafia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Literally a case of the government forcing artists to create art whether they want to or not.

And they issued this ruling right after the Masterpiece ruling in the SCOTUS.

The appellants in Brush & Nib v. Phoenix:


1 posted on 06/08/2018 1:05:19 PM PDT by Ciaphas Cain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

” blanket refusal of service”

So they’ve denied selling them birthday cards?


2 posted on 06/08/2018 1:07:01 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

I’ll see your Arizona Appeals Court and raise you one SCOTUS.

Overruled and remanded.


3 posted on 06/08/2018 1:08:09 PM PDT by IronJack (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

The three-judge panel said a stationery store that includes the customized design of wedding event merchandise is not “entitled to First Amendment free speech protections.”


Why not? Does the constitution only apply to people that choose to put food on the table by being someone else’s employee/slave?


4 posted on 06/08/2018 1:08:58 PM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I wonder if these gay couples go to several card designers and cake bakers until they find one who refuses them, then they raise a stink about being refused.....


5 posted on 06/08/2018 1:11:44 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

Walk the streets of Provincetown Cap Code in the summertime? Can’t bring a child through the streets unless you have planned to use it as an educational field trip of what a scintilla of Sodom and Gomorrah was like.


6 posted on 06/08/2018 1:15:02 PM PDT by klimeckg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

You got it.


7 posted on 06/08/2018 1:15:30 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

Because it’s so difficult to locate a homosexual who chose cake decorating or floral arranging as a career field.

I know there’s a lot of people in this world who dislike me. The last thing I ever intend to do is to force them to cook food for me.


8 posted on 06/08/2018 1:16:33 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

Absolutely unconstitutional federal ruling as the feds have no constitutional authority in matters of marriage or sodomy. These are states’ issues.

It is up to the people of the state of AZ to strike down this foul Phoenix law. Changes are very good the law violates AZ Constitution. if not, it is up to the pole of AZ to vote for an amendment to the AZ constitution supporting life, liberty, and free pursuits and forbidding government coercion against such.


9 posted on 06/08/2018 1:18:29 PM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

Arizona’s courts tend to be liberal. All courts do, I guess. The legislature needs to slap them down. Maybe a statewide religious freedom act, overruling all localities?


10 posted on 06/08/2018 1:19:35 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

They actually do.

Reddit and Freeper threads investigated this story. Would you believe there were around 50 (FIFTY) bakeries who specialized in wedding cakes within 100 miles of the 2 faggots who made the first case..and chose the ONLY Christian baker outside that 100 mile radius?

Of course they targeted the Christians specifically just to make a point!


11 posted on 06/08/2018 1:19:44 PM PDT by max americana (Fired libtard employees 9 consecutive times at every election since 08'. I hope all liberals die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

This sh!t will go on until the U.S. Supreme Court rules (correctly) that most anti-discrimination laws are blatantly unconstitutional.


12 posted on 06/08/2018 1:22:56 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

Thank former Governor Jan Brewer for cowering before the sodomites hordes and vetoing their religious liberty bill.

That is why women in executive positions is far inferior to equally competent men.


13 posted on 06/08/2018 1:35:51 PM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Arizona is in, what appellate federal court district? That’s right, the 9th Circus.


14 posted on 06/08/2018 1:37:20 PM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216
Absolutely unconstitutional federal ruling as the feds have no constitutional authority in matters of marriage or sodomy. These are states’ issues.

I live in a state where the legislature *and* the courts have an unapologetic contempt for the 2nd Amendment.In fact,SCOTUS recently struck down a Massachusetts law restricting these rights by a 9-0 vote.

OTOH,this Arizona court has violated someone's First Amendment rights.

15 posted on 06/08/2018 1:38:32 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (You Say "White Privilege"...I Say "Protestant Work Ethic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

It is unfortunate that so many Bill of Rights cases are being decided in the courts and not in the legislatures.


16 posted on 06/08/2018 1:41:35 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana; JBW1949
Exactly. The jackwagon who wanted to embarass the county clerk in Kentucky came from several counties away in Ohio to demand that she sign his "gay marriage" certificate.

The distances and circumstances may change, but the goal rem ains the same. I am only surprised that this is happening in Arizona rather than, say, Oregon or Vermont.

17 posted on 06/08/2018 1:42:49 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

These ladies truly are artists. Ya gotta love red blooded American women. Check out their website.

http://www.brushandnib.com/


18 posted on 06/08/2018 1:50:16 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Those amendments are pointed directly and exclusively at the feds and nowhere else.

The Constitution does NOT forbid the people of each state to decide for themselves about these matters. Again, marriage and sodomy are constitutionally state, not federal, issues.

And may I remind you that since the feds have unconstitutionally taken it upon themselves to enforce on the states their own exclusive constitutional prohibitions, they have perpetrated a parade of horribles including forbidding prayer and the Bible in schools, forcing quotas and affirmative action, overturned state anti-abortion laws, forcing the gay agenda in the name of “civil rights”, threatening to snuff out the 2nd amendment and on and on.

The feds are NOT your friend. If you don’t keep the feds chained up tight with the Constitution the feds will destroy you, me, our freedoms, our lives, and America.


19 posted on 06/08/2018 1:57:09 PM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

Why didn’t they go to a Muslim Owned business?


20 posted on 06/08/2018 1:57:49 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Samantha BeeITCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson