Posted on 06/04/2018 11:21:15 PM PDT by bitt
The US Senate today released over 500 pages of information related to the Spygate scandal.
Hidden in the information are unredacted Strzok Page texts that show the FBI initiated actions to insert multiple spies in the Trump campaign in December 2015.
Once again Internet sleuths unearthed damning evidence that the FBI was engaged in Spygate long before they let on.
As we reported previously, according to far left Politico, Comey stated in March of 2017 under oath that the FBI investigation into the Trump Russia scandal started in July 2016:
FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Monday that his agency has been investigating possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian officials since last July [2016].
The newly revealed timeline which Comey detailed in a much-anticipated House Intelligence Committee hearing means the FBI probe was occurring during the peak of an alleged Russian campaign to destabilize the presidential race and eventually help elect President Donald Trump.
But Comey appears to have lied about this.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
He showed his hand when he fabricated a way to save Obamacare with his ridiculous “It’s a tax, not a fee” position.
—
He sure did. I lost ALL faith in the “supreme” court at that point - the concept of allowing the government to compel us to buy whatever it is they demand we buy or pay a “tax” to them is obscene.
Indictments of Deep State seditionists and perjurers can be expected from AG Keebler Elf any day now.
Not sure about that... but its possible, I thought it was about the individual mandate and penalties
The only drawback to that scenario is that Trump was not some unknown. He has been living in the public eye for decades; if there were any dirt on him, the tabloids would have picked up on it eons ago. Many of the Republicans in the candidate lineup had little name recognition and did not live public lives (political careers notwithstanding).
My guess Trump was the only candidate that wasn’t bought and sold for and the only outsider and deemed a threat to the deep state.
Mueller’s appointment was unconstitutional and illegal (see appointments clause in the Constitution). Rosenstein and Mueller to be indicted for seditious conspiracy.
Trump was correctly seen as the only threat to the deep state, so that is why he was targeted and still is.
Also, I know that we are all fed up with the glacial pace of things, and we DO have to face the fact that, people in the Obama administration who are culpable in this may never be taken to task, even though they should be. And we also probably have to face up to the fact that all the people who SHOULD get nailed on all this...simply won't. And that isn't good. But...SOME people are going to be nailed. it is illuminating to see this Trump Tower meeting in the light of what it actually was: a set up meeting where one side said they wanted to meet to discuss dirt on Clinton so that it would lay the groundwork to later say "LOOK! THE TRUMP TEAM WAS COLLUDING THERE!"
It might have been sufficient, if they had been able to dig up any other information on Trump which they were unable to do, and I believe that made them even more desperate, even frantic enough to send Halper into Papadopoulous' orbit on September 13, 2016 to outright ASK him: George, you know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?
Anyway, they thought they would have so much damning information, nobody would spend much time looking at the meeting with Trump Jr. on May 10, 2016 at Trump Towers.
The problem for them was...their wells kept coming up dry as the election approached, and when Trump won, they knew they were screwed, because it was all going to come out, particularly when the unsung hero (and possible unwitting accomplice) Admiral Michael Flynn made his fateful trip on November 17, 2016 to speak to the incoming President-Elect and his staff, to tell them they were being surveilled. (Trump moved his team out of Trump Towers in the next day or two to a different location due to their knowledge of the surveillance.)
And that was all of them...Strozk, Lisa Page, Brennan, McCabe, Comey, Priestap, Lynch, Clinton, Abedin, and yes...Obama too (even if he may never be called to account, this stain of sewage is going to splash on him as well) knew that the spying issue was not going to go quietly into the night.
So, in light of that, many people began looking at the contacts, and looking at that Trump Jr. meeting at Trump Towers on June 9, 2016, it highlighted to any sane person just what an obvious setup this is (my post yesterday):
You mean the meeting with the Russian Lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya who,
according to The Washington Post had dinner with GPS founder Glenn Simpson both the day before and the day after she met with Donald Trump, Jr. at Trump Tower.
That one?
The meeting that was kicked off with this email from Ron Goldstone, the American agent for the Agalarovs? "...Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting. The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father. This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin..."(This was an excerpt from the email)
The same lawyer (as reported by the New York Times on April 27th, 2018) who has repeatedly said she was acting on her own huddled with Vladimir Putins prosecutor general, Yuri Y. Chaika, in the months before the meeting?
The same lawyer who was banned from entering the USA had her travel-banned visa approved in a highly unusual process called "immigration parole" by DHS and the State Department (under Hillary Clinton)
That EXACT same lawyer who, in her own words (again, as reported by the New York Times on April 27th, 2018 said: I am a lawyer, and I am an informant, she said. Since 2013, I have been actively communicating with the office of the Russian prosecutor general.
The meeting where Anatoli Samachornov, the interpreter had contractual ties to the State Department under Hillary Clinton?
Could be coincidence. That same meeting?
The same meeting where the Russian lawyer brought along a Russian named Rinat Akhmetshin, a former Soviet counterintelligence officer who has ties ongoing ties with Russian Intelligence?
The meeting where an American citizen Ike Kaveladze (who worked for the two Russian pop star Emin Agalarov and his father, Aras Agalarov (a Russian oligarch with direct ties to Vladimir Putin) who asked their agent Ron Goldstone to set up the meeting) ostensibly wanted to be at the meeting as an interpreter for the Russian Lawyer Veselnitskaya only to find he wasn't needed because "she brought her own (Samachornov) who had this most curious statement (from the apparently recorded transcripts of the meeting): "...Mr. Trump asked if they got anything on Hilary, and to which Mr. Akhmetshin responded, "Why don't you do your own research on her? We gave you the idea..."
And then nothing (apart from that statement was discussed above by Mr. Kaveladze) was discussed except for the statement above. They Russian side with the lawyer said they were going to talk about dirt on Hillary, but ended up saying absolutely nothing about that, and said they only came to talk about the Magnitsky act and child adoption processes, which Trump Jr. said wasn't even on the agenda.
Any normal person should read that paragraph and say "Hm." as in "Things that make you go "Hm"."
This goes on and on. Only an idiot would see this as anything other than a blatant setup. It was good that Trump Jr. released all the correspondence and details of the meeting. The agreement to the meeting was dumb, but as President Trump himself said (and I paraphrase just a little) "this is politics. If someone told us they had dirt on someone, we would take a meeting like that) so when it became clear, Trump Jr. immediately released the details. That saved much heartache later.
SCJ Roberts has this problem. Obama used it.
https://www.firstmotherforum.com/2013/08/adoptive-father-john-roberts-not.html
Chief Justice John Roberts who sided with four other justices isn’t a disinterested jurist when it comes to adoption. He is an adoptive father and his acquisition of two children known to be Irish—via adopting them from a South American country—has raised a lot of questions. Irish law allows only people living in Ireland to adopt Irish children. They cannot be adopted internationally, as would have been the case—if not for whisking the birth mothers to a third country not bothered by prohibitions against adoption for foreigners.
There’s no public record of how or why these children got to South America, but the facts suggest it was to circumvent Irish law. When The New York Times began looking into his adoptions during his appointment hearings, there were charges of “violation of privacy”, as Wikipedia noted—until recently when this data was scrubbed from his Wikipedia page. Now it simply says he has two adopted children. Roberts and his wife, a lawyer with We note here that he and his wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, married in their forties, and tried to have children but were unable to and so turned to adoption, but after several failed adoption attempts, “got lucky,” according to the New York Times. Mrs. Roberts comes from an Irish Catholic family, and a source close to the Roberts family, who requested anonymity in order to discuss judicial deliberations, told The Huffington Post that the justice’s wife, Jane, exercises a “heavy influence” over her husband.
😁👍
The same reason D’nesh D’zousa was prosecuted.
The same reason the IRS was weaponizing to target the Tea Party.
The same reason a government agency hacked into investigative journalists Sherryl Atkinson’s computer.
The same reason the government spied on the phone calls of journalist James Rosen and his parents.
The same reason the Obama government spied on phone calls being made by US Senators’ from their cloak room.
Because the unrepentant USA hating communist Obama did all this....it is what commie’s do.
But it was proper. It was to protect Trump. /s
I look at it like the ULTRA intelligence the allies got during WWII...they couldn't use it all the time, or suspicions would be raised.
So the handlers of the ULTRA knowledge were occasionally put in the position of having to play God with ULTRA intelligence, and consign ships or units to an uncertain or bad fate instead of tipping them off.
Like Justice Roberts...they don't have to use him on every case. Only important ones. Like Obamacare, and a few others.
What if the person given immunity lies? Doesnt that void it?
That was not the question asked.
Beatings and hangings are in order for the seditionists...
means the FBI probe was occurring during the peak of an alleged Russian campaign to destabilize the presidential race and eventually help elect President Donald Trump.
Help elect Trump? No. How bout elect Shrillary. Puten is no dummy.
Gaaah. I meant Admiral Rogers made the trip to Trump Towers to warn the President Elect and his team, not Gen. Flynn. Too many names flying around...
Grants of immunity cannot be given unilaterally by a prosecutor. They have to be approved by the head of the DOJ Criminal Division as well as the AG/DAG.
Immunity comes with conditions and limitations that must be followed.
There was a time when people would be hanged for this type of thing, but I think that, when Jane Fonda went to North Vietnam without being brought to task for doing so on her return to CONUS, all these treason and sedition penalties became unusable.
Sadly.
Absolutely!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.