Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bulwyf

Having a safety on is something I am just not comfortable with. I know it is just a training issue to thumb the safety off but it is still just one more variable to go wrong under life threatening stress.

I used to assume it was a non-issue until my friend lost 2 deer on 2 separate occassions leaving the safety on his lever gun. In both occassions, during the heat of buck fever, he aimed and fired, and even had time to cycle the lever and fire again, thinking his round was a dud each time.

It was only later when calm returned, that he had the presence of mind to check the safety. I will only speak for myself when I say I wold worry about presenting a 1911 on safety and in the stress of self defense, would forget to take the safety off and be dumbstruck why the pistol was not firing. Others are more comfortable believing they will take the safety off. I am not.

With a non safety gun like a Sig or Glock in Condition 2 with a round chambered and ready to fire, it is basically like a revolver. Just aim and shoot and practice using your finger as a safety. Off target, off trigger. On target on trigger.

I am shocked and disturbed how often I see police officers on target but off trigger with a suspect. I think it is horrible training and a recipe for accidental shootings. I understand the philosophy. They dont waste time aiming if they are already aiming at the suspect, but my training is not to do that unless I intend to shoot.

I am baffled that police training does not require officers to hold at low ready unless they intend to sischarge their firearm. Just baffled.


162 posted on 06/04/2018 9:51:22 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (End the Mueller Gestapo now. Free the Donald.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

That baffles me too. I don’t point unless I’m intending to fire. I don’t use use a manual safety, my finger takes care of that for me. I’m with you. If your manual safety is on, in the heat of the moment, things can go wrong.


163 posted on 06/04/2018 10:22:12 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free; Bulwyf

Seems to me what baffles you is the distinction between pointing in on a target and pointing in on a threat.

The safety is on when there is no threat or you are not ready to fire (i.e. holstered). The safety is off when you are either ready to fire (pointed in on a target) or there is a threat and you have just come to the ready in order to address that threat.

I am assuming that when one says they are not comfortable with a 1911 safety being on that they are also smart enough not to holster with a round in the chamber. With a round in the chamber, locked and cocked is the way it was designed. Without a round in the chamber it would be ok to have safety off, but many ranges would not like that practice since no one looking on knows if you have one in the chamber or not. Carrying a 1911 cocked but not locked is a recipe for a trip to the hospital or worse.

I am not a LEO but my defensive training was initially to draw to low ready and then safety off (if one is present) as you point in to the target. More advanced training was to skip the low ready and draw immediately to high retention, then again, safety off (if present) as you extend and point in. Faster sight acquisition going from high retention to pointed in than from low ready.

In either case, if I have decided to go from the ready or high retention to pointed in, that is because I now have a threat I have made a decision needs shooting and my finger is going to be taking up slack at the same time I am extending to point in. I can always decide to go finger off after extending if the threat goes away between the decision to point in and actually being pointed in.


167 posted on 06/04/2018 11:07:17 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

“Having a safety on is something I am just not comfortable with. I know it is just a training issue to thumb the safety off but it is still just one more variable to go wrong under life threatening stress.

I used to assume it was a non-issue until my friend lost 2 deer on 2 separate occassions leaving the safety on his lever gun. In both occassions, during the heat of buck fever, he aimed and fired, and even had time to cycle the lever and fire again, thinking his round was a dud each time.”

Sounds like you are recommending that you keep the safety off while hunting. I don’t think that was your intent.


171 posted on 06/04/2018 11:15:09 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

“. I know it is just a training issue to thumb the safety off but it is still just one more variable to go wrong under life threatening stress.”

Seems like you are a candidate for a ND. Hope no one gets hurt!


178 posted on 06/04/2018 11:48:25 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson