Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senseless on Steel
National Review ^ | June 1, 2018

Posted on 06/02/2018 7:59:13 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Originally President Donald Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum exempted imports from Canada, Mexico, and Europe. No longer. The administration has broadened the application of its tariffs even as their strategic and economic costs are becoming more apparent.

The law gives Trump the authority to impose tariffs to protect national security. These tariffs are, however, an abuse of that law. The Department of Defense has explained that the military needs only 3 percent of our domestic steel and aluminum production, and our largest supplier, Canada, is an ally — albeit one that now has reason to be miffed with us. The steel and aluminum tariffs have undermined our ability to make common cause with other countries against Chinese mercantilism, and even aided China’s campaign to gain influence among them.

Economically, we will pay for these tariffs twice over. Companies that rely on steel and aluminum will pay higher prices — and those companies are responsible for far more employment than the steel and aluminum industries themselves. For that reason, President George W. Bush’s steel tariffs were estimated to cost more jobs than they protected, as were President Barack Obama’s tire tariffs. There is no reason to expect happier results this time. And other countries are also imposing retaliatory tariffs on us.

Most congressional Republicans think the tariffs, by hurting their constituents, will also hurt their reelection prospects. They would like to campaign on today’s strong economy and the tax and regulatory policies that have helped to bring it about. The president’s new trade taxes counteract those policies.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: steel; tariffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 06/02/2018 7:59:13 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

No need to read beyond “National Review”.

L


2 posted on 06/02/2018 8:02:07 AM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
President Reagan, asserting that he was trying ''to enforce the principles of free and fair trade,'' imposed a 100 percent tariff today on some Japanese-made computers, television sets and power tools....

The Administration levied 100 percent tariffs on four main products: portable and desktop computers that process 16 bits of information or more; color televisions 18 to 20 inches in screen size, and a few types of power hand tools.

https://www.nytimes.com/1987/04/18/business/president-imposes-tariff-on-imports-against-japanese.html

3 posted on 06/02/2018 8:04:38 AM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Kneel! Kneel you American serfs, obey your Canadian, Mexican and European betters. It’s your destiny to be unemployed so we can live off the sweat of your brows.


4 posted on 06/02/2018 8:06:22 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Note that Reagan put the tariff on final goods. Trump put tariffs on intermediate goods which encourages firms to just import final goods rather than absorb price increases.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/steel-tariffs-are-taxing-some-american-companies-1527940800?mod=mhp


5 posted on 06/02/2018 8:11:13 AM PDT by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Every one of our trading partners enacts protections for their industries while expecting the USA to allow their products in duty free. Eff them. It’s about time a President reciprocated. I salute Trump for taking action against these one way policies negotiated by the USA’s worst enemy... the State Department.

State = Ivy League traitors.


6 posted on 06/02/2018 8:12:09 AM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I think what we’re witnessing is the Art Of the Deal. Trump is moving three-D chess pieces while everybody else is trying to figure out the name of the game. If Trump pulls this off, then our insular “allies” will be forced to open their protected markets to US goods. The reason much of those American made goods have tariffs on them is the high cost of the socialist made products they compete against. American goods without tariffs will take market share by winning on price as well as quality. Ultimately, this may force governments to adjust down their taxes on their own goods.


7 posted on 06/02/2018 8:12:48 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Leave it to National Globalist Review, run and funded almost entirely by, rich, globalist, conservative dirtbags who will sell out the country for more trade, that is, money in their pocket. These scumbags like the koch brothers, open borders amnesty slime dont care if America is taken over by foreigners as long as they keep making money. Death to all of them.

National Review is just their mouthpiece for their anti american propaganda. They hire dirtbags like Low Lofe Lowry, goldberg, etal in order to try to put a veneer of respectability on their globalist crap.


8 posted on 06/02/2018 8:13:55 AM PDT by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oincobx

Exactly. I’m kinda scratching my head over this one because Canada is hardly a problem for the U.S. as a trading partner.


9 posted on 06/02/2018 8:16:09 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Okeydoker

They happen to raise good points on this. Whether a steel tariff is a good idea or a bad idea really just depends on whether you’re SELLING or BUYING steel. And there are far more companies buying steel in the U.S. today than selling it.


10 posted on 06/02/2018 8:21:04 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

That is exactly why Trump says it is a national security issue. If the US must buy foreign made steel, that is a problem in case of war or other national security period. Trump is saying that consideration is more important than companies paying for cheaper steel to make stuff.


11 posted on 06/02/2018 8:23:52 AM PDT by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Okeydoker

If we can’t depend on Canada in a time of war we are in bad shape. This isn’t about national security at all. This is about the steel and aluminum workers unions and management obtaining special favors. They are seeking rent.


12 posted on 06/02/2018 8:37:27 AM PDT by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Make more steel HERE! AMERICAN steel!

The Black vote, the Jewish vote, the union vote...

Where to next?, my president!

WINNING! MORE WINNING!


13 posted on 06/02/2018 8:41:51 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

National Review, Senseless on everything.


14 posted on 06/02/2018 8:44:36 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Who is your choice for 2020?


15 posted on 06/02/2018 8:49:53 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1


16 posted on 06/02/2018 8:52:58 AM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

This is not really a new issue by any stretch. I worked in the Steel Industry back in the 70s and it was the same then. It required massive investment to modernize factories to make quality steel. Quite a number of countries justified the expense by claiming it was necessary so their military “couldn’t be cut off”. Belgium and China are two i remember but there are plenty more. The problem comes when you try to ramp up “economy of scale” to reduce the unit price. So they intentionally make more steel than they can use. This steel has to be sold on foreign markets at below the cost of actually producing it. Nothing new and they have been doing it to us for decades. For a long time we let them because “at least they aren’t commies”. That is no longer a valid justification but they are so spoiled now they can’t adjust.


17 posted on 06/02/2018 8:58:15 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
Attention: Eurotrash Nations!

European Choices

Trade War

Or, Implement 'Fair Trade' Policies

Choose wisely!


18 posted on 06/02/2018 9:04:15 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Trump does what is good for Americans. Then, the world gets their pants in a knot, too bad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Okeydoker

That argument doesn’t work for aluminum, though. Aluminum is smelted from bauxite ore, and almost 100% of this ore is imported — mainly from Asia, Australia and Brazil.


19 posted on 06/02/2018 9:05:55 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

China just started dumping their steel in Canada, Mexico and the EU who turned it around and started dumping it here.

A nation that does not make it’s own metals, especially steel, is a defenseless nation.


20 posted on 06/02/2018 9:12:32 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson