Posted on 05/29/2018 8:54:49 AM PDT by snarkpup
Willem briefly reviews the history of who arrived when in South Africa and who invaded whom. Includes a video clip of a black politician basically admitting this.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
This is not the standard explanation of South Africa that one gets from the mainstream media and the civil rights industry. It would be interesting to read more about this. I'm wondering if there are any histories of the area that all factions would agree are true.
There was a black population there, but it was hunted down and largely exterminated by both the Bantu and European migrations.
The Europeans generally left the Kosians alone, because they were no threat to the Europeans.
Presumably the Khoisan, which he talks about in the video. He says he's going to interview one of their surviving descendents in a few days.
Blacks also sold blacks to slave ships. Try explaining how lib demonrats are the enemies of blacks.
Cool, thanks!
The Covenant, by James Michener, is an easy way to begin that journey...
Other African tribes (mainly Bantu) were cattle herders whose migration was impeded by the tse tse fly and other barriers.
When the Dutch settled Cape Town, there were very few if any natives around, and some blacks were actually imported by the Europeans as slaves.
If I understand it was largely a nomadic population called the Khoisan, lighter skinned and smaller. Yeah, and they were decimated.
A simple reading of THE WASHING OF THE SPEARS by Donald R. Morris show who was there first (Bushmen) then came the Hottentots (Khoikhoi) then the Portuguese, then the Dutch (Boers), then the English. The Bantu were far to the Northeast beyond Natal. along the coast bordered by the Drakenburg Mts.
Then Shaka sent his impis South west, next, Dingane and problems began when Boers were moving NE and Zulus SW.
Home viewing bookmark.
The South Africans are of 3 different races: Khoisan/Bushmen (same race), Caucasian (Europeans, South Asians) and Afroid (bantu-speakers) with a large number of mixed race folks.
Khoi-san/Bushmen are not "black" as we consider the term (meaning Afroid/Negroid) - their physical features show that their branch split off from Negroid/Caucasian/Mongoloid people very, very early. There are more differences between the San peoples and Negroid folks than between Negroid folks and Caucasians
The "whites" as in Boers have been there so long they are native Africans
Bluntly putting it (and factually too) -- THIS is an African-American person
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.