Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mystery in Mueller probe: Where’s the hacking indictment?
The Hill ^ | 22 May 2018 | Morgan Chalfant

Posted on 05/22/2018 8:25:12 AM PDT by Magnatron

In the year since the start of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, one thing has been notably absent: a public indictment of any Russians for the hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

Mueller has charged President Trump’s former campaign chief, secured guilty pleas from several individuals in Trump’s orbit and indicted 13 Russians for an elaborate plot to leverage social media to influence the American electorate.

But the special counsel has yet to announce charges for the hacking of the DNC, even though the intelligence community and private cybersecurity experts linked the attack to the Russian government more than a year ago. Legal experts say there are several possible explanations.

“[The reasons] can range from, there’s no evidence of any known individuals, to publicly announcing the indictment would compromise other aspects of the investigation” said Mark Zaid, a Washington-based attorney specializing in national security.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: awanbrothers; dnc; dnchacked; hacking; mueller; muellerinvestigation; sethrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Magnatron

Hacking Indictment?There will never be a Hacking Indictment since the DNC’s files were not hacked into.

Debby Wasserman Schultz left the doors wide opened when she hired the Pakastani Aswan brothers to “service”the DNC servers.

Who knows who got access to the DNC information.


41 posted on 05/22/2018 9:33:25 AM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

The Awans were contracted for Congressional computers.
Not sure if he would have had access to the DNC server.
Seth Rich did have access.

There is a pic of Seth Rich and Awan in this thread. #14

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3657035/posts?page=2#2


42 posted on 05/22/2018 9:41:41 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Henry Hnyellar

When Comey was asked if there was evidence that foreign intelligence agencies had accessed Hillary’s home server, he said that there was no such evidence but those agencies are so accomplished that they would leave no such evidence. However, Comey also said he believes Crowdstrike found evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC servers. Both statements cannot be true.


43 posted on 05/22/2018 9:49:20 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Henry Hnyellar

You are gonna have to be more explanatory on your point. I work in the cyber field and understand who they are.


44 posted on 05/22/2018 9:54:11 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

If there was a hacking indictment or criminal proceedings, the DOJ would have to PRODUCE EVIDENCE OF SUCH HACKING and who was responsible.

Any evidence would almost certainly NOT SUPPORT HACKING but would, instead, point toward an actual INTERNAL LEAK. That’s the last thing the CORRUPT DOJ wants to see made public.


45 posted on 05/22/2018 10:27:34 AM PDT by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

They should indict themselves???


46 posted on 05/22/2018 10:48:39 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
[There was no hack of the DNC.
It was a leak.
His name was Seth Rich.
He was plugged.]


47 posted on 05/22/2018 11:49:04 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Correct


48 posted on 05/22/2018 11:49:52 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

The DNC probably has refused to allow the Special Counsel to inspect their machines—or have destroyed them using the Bleach Bit app, eh?


49 posted on 05/22/2018 11:57:02 AM PDT by wildbill (Quis Custodiet ipsos custodes? Who watches the watchmen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

But yet we’re told the Russians have 30,000 emails from Clinton, Trump paid for the hack, Trump’s people transmitted and received data from the hack. And no proof of any of that.
______________________________________________________________

This is driving me insane. Democrat talking points are even here on FR. The “hacked” DNC server had nothing to do with Hitlerys 30,000 emails.


50 posted on 05/22/2018 2:07:50 PM PDT by HenpeckedCon (Covfefe Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

The traitor used Page to get the max FISA warrants. He was never a target since he had assisted them years before in outing Russian spies for prosecution. Page was an FBI asset inserted into the Trump campaign, as a focal point by which warrants of the most invasive type could be obtained.


51 posted on 05/22/2018 2:53:16 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HenpeckedCon
This is driving me insane. Democrat talking points are even here on FR. The “hacked” DNC server had nothing to do with Hitlerys 30,000 emails.

Too fast with the fingers. I meant the hack reference to be separate in that string of things, but wasn't very clear. One of the challenges of not having editing capability on FR.

52 posted on 05/22/2018 3:07:18 PM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Soooooo, Is Carter Page a GOOD guy or a SPY??? I cannot tell!


53 posted on 05/22/2018 3:20:23 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

I understand.


54 posted on 05/22/2018 3:32:45 PM PDT by HenpeckedCon (Covfefe Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

He was used by the FBI to get the deep surveillance they wanted for their frame. Did he know they would use him that way? Well, he certainly has no fear of being prosecuted, and he has a history of being an FBI informant.


55 posted on 05/22/2018 7:41:21 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

There’s no mystery. There was no hack.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The e-mails to Assange were likely provided by Seth Rich ( deceased). Mueller does not want to go there.


56 posted on 05/23/2018 1:19:56 AM PDT by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Thanks for posting a link to this picture of Seth Rich with Debbie Whatshername Schultz's Pakistani boyfriend the night before he was killed.


57 posted on 05/23/2018 4:09:00 PM PDT by politicianslie (Lying to Americans is easy-Presstitutes repeat what they are told to say!-and they say it 24/7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Thanks for posting a link to this picture of Seth Rich with Debbie Whatshername Schultz's Pakistani boyfriend the night before he was killed.


58 posted on 05/23/2018 4:09:00 PM PDT by politicianslie (Lying to Americans is easy-Presstitutes repeat what they are told to say!-and they say it 24/7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson