It was a leak.
His name was Seth Rich.
He was plugged.]
Posted on 05/22/2018 8:25:12 AM PDT by Magnatron
In the year since the start of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, one thing has been notably absent: a public indictment of any Russians for the hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC).
Mueller has charged President Trump’s former campaign chief, secured guilty pleas from several individuals in Trump’s orbit and indicted 13 Russians for an elaborate plot to leverage social media to influence the American electorate.
But the special counsel has yet to announce charges for the hacking of the DNC, even though the intelligence community and private cybersecurity experts linked the attack to the Russian government more than a year ago. Legal experts say there are several possible explanations.
“[The reasons] can range from, there’s no evidence of any known individuals, to publicly announcing the indictment would compromise other aspects of the investigation” said Mark Zaid, a Washington-based attorney specializing in national security.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Hacking Indictment?There will never be a Hacking Indictment since the DNC’s files were not hacked into.
Debby Wasserman Schultz left the doors wide opened when she hired the Pakastani Aswan brothers to “service”the DNC servers.
Who knows who got access to the DNC information.
The Awans were contracted for Congressional computers.
Not sure if he would have had access to the DNC server.
Seth Rich did have access.
There is a pic of Seth Rich and Awan in this thread. #14
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3657035/posts?page=2#2
When Comey was asked if there was evidence that foreign intelligence agencies had accessed Hillary’s home server, he said that there was no such evidence but those agencies are so accomplished that they would leave no such evidence. However, Comey also said he believes Crowdstrike found evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC servers. Both statements cannot be true.
You are gonna have to be more explanatory on your point. I work in the cyber field and understand who they are.
If there was a hacking indictment or criminal proceedings, the DOJ would have to PRODUCE EVIDENCE OF SUCH HACKING and who was responsible.
Any evidence would almost certainly NOT SUPPORT HACKING but would, instead, point toward an actual INTERNAL LEAK. That’s the last thing the CORRUPT DOJ wants to see made public.
They should indict themselves???
Correct
The DNC probably has refused to allow the Special Counsel to inspect their machines—or have destroyed them using the Bleach Bit app, eh?
But yet we’re told the Russians have 30,000 emails from Clinton, Trump paid for the hack, Trump’s people transmitted and received data from the hack. And no proof of any of that.
______________________________________________________________
This is driving me insane. Democrat talking points are even here on FR. The “hacked” DNC server had nothing to do with Hitlerys 30,000 emails.
The traitor used Page to get the max FISA warrants. He was never a target since he had assisted them years before in outing Russian spies for prosecution. Page was an FBI asset inserted into the Trump campaign, as a focal point by which warrants of the most invasive type could be obtained.
Too fast with the fingers. I meant the hack reference to be separate in that string of things, but wasn't very clear. One of the challenges of not having editing capability on FR.
Soooooo, Is Carter Page a GOOD guy or a SPY??? I cannot tell!
I understand.
He was used by the FBI to get the deep surveillance they wanted for their frame. Did he know they would use him that way? Well, he certainly has no fear of being prosecuted, and he has a history of being an FBI informant.
There’s no mystery. There was no hack.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The e-mails to Assange were likely provided by Seth Rich ( deceased). Mueller does not want to go there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.