Posted on 05/21/2018 5:08:52 AM PDT by Kaslin
Santa Fe is the latest tragedy in a line of catastrophic school shootings.
Our children are sitting ducks in their schools these days.
Our children are everything to us. They are our future. Our happiness. Our light.
Why is it that we do not protect our most precious humans like we protect our banks, or police stations, or courthouses? Why are Americans so lackadaisical when it comes to school security measures?
The Problem:
I attended a City Council meeting and observed PTA mothers ask City Council to NOT place any armed police officers in their kids’ school. They said they did not want anyone armed on school campus. Parents, whose children go to that school, did not want anyone at that school who would be able to stop a shooter. Their reasoning, or lack thereof, still pains me months later.
What’s the point of school security? To protect children’s lives. Why be against the protection of your child’s life? This boggles my mind.
I believe that an overwhelming majority of parents value their children’s lives above all else. That’s how humans survive - we protect our children so that they can live on and have their own children, and so on. To protect our children when we are not in school with them, we need to be able to hire armed, trained security. But to this date, very few schools in the US have hired full-time armed security guards.
We hear smart advice from security experts about instituting Israel’s school security measures. But we don’t implement them. Why?
Israeli schools, by law, must post armed guards to check anyone who enters the school. These guards engage threats, and they work at the school every day. There is only one entrance into each school, and everyone who enters the school must pass through one entrance. Israel has diminished their school shootings. It looks like this works.
So why don’t we do this on a large scale? Democrats.
Instead of enacting immediate, effective measures to stop school shootings, Democrats are encouraging “policy change” for background checks on gun purchases. Democrats are successfully convincing Americans that the longest road to the least tailored solution is the optimal response. Democrats have convinced Americans that asking the government for policy change and waiting many years for policy change to take effect, asking for a law that does not directly shield children from any immediate harm, is somehow a valuable use of their adrenaline.
But a law does not physically manifest itself and magically appear between a shooter and his victim to prevent the shooter from killing his victim. A law does not instantaneously defend; it merely creates deterrence. In this case, the law they are seeking would take many years to have any effect, and the effect would be indirect. The result would certainly not provide any assistance to the children asking their government to protect them. Why are parents not demanding immediate protection, physical protection? Why are kids not demanding armed security to defend them? Because they are publicly encouraged by liberal media and liberal educators not to think via rational self-interest, but to support this groupthink Democrat cause of “gun control.”
While encouraging this far-stretched concept of “gun control,” Democrats are simultaneously discouraging immediate response measures. This appears to be because the immediate response to bad guys with guns requires good guys with guns. That’s where the Democrats retract. They have spent so much time and effort on vilifying the inanimate object that is a firearm, that admitting it can be used for good becomes a political nightmare for them. So they don’t do it.
Democrats need to stop capitalizing on school shootings to promote the idea of policy change on gun ownership. This approach to school shootings has done NOTHING to prevent school shootings, and in fact, cannot stop them. They need to prioritize children’s lives over their political games. This call for gun control after every shooting is an unethical waste of opportunity to call for the immediate protection of life.
That City Council meeting I discussed in the beginning, it was in a city that votes over 78% Democrat. Odds are that those PTA moms were Democrats or listened to liberal news. That’s the only reason I can think of that would cause an otherwise rational parent to have asked the City to keep armed security away from their school.
The Solution:
An armed, trained security guard can stop a shooter. But one is not enough. Each school needs to be evaluated based on its size and entrance points to determine how many guards are necessary to safeguard the school. These security guards must be posted at all times school is in session. School entry points must be limited
But don’t just listen to me. I’m not an expert. Listen to security experts. America has thousands of trained security experts. So do our allies, the Israelis, who instituted the most successful school security measures in the world.
I read, listened to and spoke with some of our American experts before writing this article. They studied and implemented security, and they studied shootings from around the world, including Breslan, Russia (334 killed), Ma’alot, Israel (25 killed), and Colorado, USA (15 killed). They all have advised the same thing: schools need dedicated, trained, armed security and limited entrance points guarded by armed security.
Well, our experts have described the exact system that Israel has implemented. It looks like the solution is unanimous. But Israel has been successful at implementation because their government is on-board with immediate response to assaults on children. They listened to the experts.
When you have a toothache, you go to the dentist. When charged with a crime, you go to a lawyer. When you are afraid of school shootings, you go to security experts. (When faced with any of these problems, you definitely don’t go to Congress and ask for a long, drawn-out process of policy intervention that may or may not take effect in the next decade, and which may or may not have any effect on your problem.)
Our experts go into significant detail as to how security can be improved for each school. They discuss everything from limiting entry points to forcing everyone to pass through metal detectors. Experts also recommend ALICE drills for the students. Security experts advise that security measures must be tailored to each school. They have spent the past two decades developing these ideas as our school shootings have been increasing. We need to listen to them.
Take Action:
You need to take action in your schools and communities.
Ask your child’s school about security. Demand armed, trained security permanently posted at each entrance. Attend town meetings and council meetings, and tell them that you want armed security.
One school resource officer is NOT enough. Ask for the school to hire an expert to evaluate your school’s needs to recommend a customized security plan, everything from reducing entrance points to adding metal detectors to implementing the adequate number of security guards for each entry point.
I practice what I preach. I’ve already notified our school of our security demands and our school tells me they are listening. I need to do more. I will continue to do more.
Don’t be shy and don’t worry about offending the school. Protect your children. Protect America’s children.
We put armed guards in banks where our money resides for safe keeping, are our children not more important than our money?
“Our children are sitting ducks in their schools these days.”
And the Libs love it. They hope and pray for more of these shootings because they think it gets them closer to their ultimate goal of civilian disarmament. What’s a few hundred more kids when they’ve already killed millions thru abortion. AND, once America is disarmed, the real killing will begin. Conservatives will be hunted down and killed on the spot. Forget the cattle cars; forget the internment camps. Mass graves will be the Plan of the Day.
DAY OF WRATH by William Forstchen.
Nothing is 100% foolproof but a metal detector and armed security are pretty effective.
The leftists and the politicians use the excuse that armed guards and metal detectors are “too expensive.” All they have to do to solve that problem is fire the layers of beaurocrats being paid $150,000 a year to indoctrinate our kids in left wing ideologies.
People need to focus on what’s really important and pass on the materialism.
Most of family’s second income is spent on extra clothes for work, more convenience foods and eating out, daycare and babysitters, and a myriad of other little extra expenses that re incurred.
It CAN be done and I know plenty of homeschool families who did it on one income and were by the world’s standards, poor.
Someone just has to want to do it bad enough.
Besides, for those few who literally cannot do it, the kids would be better off NOT being in school at all.
Not by any accounts I've read.
He was a student at the high school he shot up.
Care to provide the evidence that he was homeschooled?
What an intelligent, concise public school rebuttal.
And that doesn't stop prisoners in prisons from killing each other.
Is that really what we want to turn our public schools into?
That needs to be the mantra of every right-thinking American in the face of this never-ending onslaught by the gun-grabbers.
Playing defense and discussing "common-sense gun control is a losing strategy.
Are you really trying to equate prisons with schools? Seriously? LOL!
It’s a proven fact that schools with metal detectors and armed security have few problems. Inner city schools all have this stuff. When was the last time you saw a mass shooting at an inner city school? How about never.
Most of familys second income is spent on extra clothes for work, more convenience foods and eating out, daycare and babysitters, and a myriad of other little extra expenses that re incurred.
Another broad and unjustifiable BS statement.
Dont waste your time.
It's not the shooting that equates the public schools with prisons, but the armed guards and metal detectors.
I've been in one of Syracuse city school's finest, with armed guards and metal detectors.
Everything is locked. If you want to go to the bathroom, an armed guard escorts you to the bathroom, unlocks it,, checks it before leaving you there, and waits until you're done so he can lock it up again, and then escorts you back to the room you were in.
Last I checked, at least prisoners can use the john without being escorted.
Yeah, schools with armed guards and metal detectors are a prison because that's what you have to do to get into a prison to visit an inmate.
When was the last time you saw a mass shooting at an inner city school?
Does the name *Parkland* ring a bell?
Lots of good that armed security guard did, didn't he?
Well, the accounting works.
Maybe a net increase of 25% over one income , which can be made up with a stay at home mom who does the housekeeping etc, herself, like the rest of us homeschoolers did.
And besides, as was pointed out upthread, part time jobs can help supplement enough income.
Sneer away, but it can be done if the parents want to, if they put enough value on their children instead of the free daycare.
You took the words right out of my mouth.
You wish.
There’s lots of information on the difference on the internet if you’d bother to research it.
Here’s one example.....
Keep Working Or Stay At Home With The Kids?
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/pf/07/cut_an_income.asp
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.