Posted on 05/16/2018 6:33:41 PM PDT by Kaslin
You don’t need an indictment for impeachment. All you need is the votes.
It’s always been about impeachment or resignation...never about indictment.
“Unindicted co-conspirator” — Would be the term used and impeachment would be the call from Mad Maxine, et al.
This makes my day!!!
He’s always known this. But he WILL indict people as close to him as he can, including family members if possible. Then he will dramatically release findings “discovering” Trump’s “crimes” and magnanimously say he leaves it to Congress to use their impeachment power.
No but he can sure as h e double hockey stick set him for impeachment.
They can and should indict Clinton, however, for abusing her power in government to frame a rival political candidate. But they won’t of course. She’s above the law now.
He didn’t say Trump did nothing wrong. He said he cannot indict Trump. The SOB is playing with fire.
Mueller is a traitor to America.
Indictment was never the goal. Impeachment was, is, and always will be the goal.
Only the left did not know this.
This whole “investigation” has been a farce!
The conspiracy to destroy Trump’s presidency is exposed. The conspirators are identified. American will prevail. The US Constitution will remain intact. It’s called CROSSFIRE - HURRICANE. Start planning for your participation in the people’s march against the sins of the FBI, CIA, and DOJ in Washington as soon as the CROSSFIRE report hits the street.
They thought the voters would turn against Trump and demand he resign ,they never imagined it would go this far ,LOL
Why would anyone take Mueller’s word for anything?
Hillary thought she had cheated enough to win.
As a consequence ... if you can’t indict him then you can’t have a secret spy operation on him either.
If you can’t point to an actual crime you cannot subpoena him either.
the rats and DS have accomplished what they wanted....
At this point, I think Trump should declare that there is an asymmetrical civil war going on and proceed accordingly.
Just because the President can pardon himself does not mean he can’t be indicted. There’s nothing else in the Constitution that comes anywhere close to forbidding it. It’s absurd to interpret the Constitution as creating a class of nobility that’s above the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.