Posted on 05/10/2018 6:02:45 PM PDT by SJackson
When I was growing up, organizations that expressed any views at all similar to those expressed by Communist groups were called Communist fronts. Anyone who defended on the grounds of civil liberties the right of communists to express their hateful ideology was labeled a commie-symp.
All decent people railed against this coerced, politically correct guilt-by-association, because it endangered freedom of speech, freedom of association, basic fairness and, especially, truth.
Today a similar tactic of defamatory character assassination against people with whom one disagrees, particularly conservatives, is being employed by elements of the left, including some in the mainstream media. Consider the recent attack by Heidi Przybyla of NBC News against the recently-appointed National Security Adviser, Ambassador John Bolton, and an organization whose board he chaired before that, Gatestone Institute. The headline of the hit piece is: John Bolton chaired anti-Muslim think tank. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Przybyla wrongly called Gatestone an anti-Muslim think tank presumably because it published some articles about Muslim no-go zones in parts of Europe. The existence of certain areas in Europe that are unsafe for non-Muslims is widely debated as politically incorrect in the European media. It is well established that visible Jews wearing kippahs or other indicators of their religion have been attacked. Two weeks ago, a non-Jew apparently trying to discredit such rumors by wearing a kippah, was attacked on a Berlin street.
MAY 10, 2018 11:39 AM0 The Case of the Illegal Bedouin Village of Khan al-Ahmar JNS.org Khan al-Ahmar is an embattled Bedouin village that has been in the news -- and in the Israeli courts...
Others have been attacked as well. Even German Chancellor Angela Merkel, a vocal supporter of mass migration, has commented on this troubling situation. According to the Daily Express, Merkel warned that, There cannot be any no-go areas where people are afraid to go, but such places are a reality.
For some Gatestone writers to have participated in this debate does not make Gatestone anti-Muslim. It makes them pertinent. Even a cursory look at Gatestones website shows that its writers and scholars include numerous Muslims, such as the prominent journalists Amir Taheri; Khaled Abu Toameh; President of the American Islamic Forum M. Zuhdi Jasser; Salim Mansur, and Raheel Raza, among others. Many of Gatestones articles are, in fact, pro-Muslim advocating human rights and civil liberties for all Muslims, including Palestinians and Iranians.
Przybyla also claims that Gatestone is somehow in the pocket of Putins Russia based on the following fact: NBC News found at least four instances of known Russian trolls directly retweeting from the Gatestone account. The fact that Russian trolls may have retweeted a handful of Gatestone articles means nothing, especially as Dan Abramss Law and Crime website independently confirmed 267 retweets by MSNBCs Joy Reid. As the noted journalist Daniel Greenfield wrote, Four times vs. 267 times. If getting retweeted 4 times makes you a Russian spy, NBC must be the Kremlin. Everything on the internet is public information; anyone is free to read or tweet about it. One cannot post material labeled, except for Russians.
If Przybylas accusations sound familiar to those of us who lived through the Thought Police of the McCarthy era, it is because they are so similar. Blaming an organization for those who read or circulate its material is McCarthyesque defamation. Attributing to an organization all the views of those who are invited to debate controversial issues is McCarthyesque demonization.
Let John Bolton be judged by his own statements and actions, for which he needs no defense from me. But let not the media indulge in the discredited tactics of guilt-by-association, distortion and outright deceit based on ideological or political differences.
I am a frequent op-ed contributor to Gatestone and often speak at its events. I also proudly serve on its board.
I find Gatestone to be refreshingly centrist. It encourages dialogue between the center-left, represented by people such as Senator Joe Lieberman and myself, and people from the center- right represented by speakers such as John Bolton and the eminent historian Victor Davis Hanson. I am scheduled to speak at an event with Ayaan Hirsi Ali who, based on her own personal experiences of female genital mutilation and forced marriage, has expressed views about abuses committed by some Muslims against other Muslims in the name of Islam. These discussions are always informative and serious. I disagree with some of what I hear and read at Gatestone events and in its publications, but that is true of every organization of which I am aware. Przybyla wrenches out of context a few points of view that to her seem controversial, and not only attributes them to the organization, but makes it appear as if these views are the only ones the organization represents.
The answer to deception and falsehoods has always been truth. I urge everyone who has read Przybylas misrepresentation to go to the Gatestone website and read a wide array of its extensively substantiated articles. Then everyone can judge for themselves. Is Gatestone an anti-Muslim think tank? Or is it an open-minded institute that encourages diverse views on a wide range of pressing subjects? Then you can answer Groucho Marxs famous rhetorical question: Who are you going to believe me or your lying eyes?
Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School and author of Trumped Up, How Criminalization of Political Differences Endangers Democracy.
I remember when news was news, not propaganda and then they advertorial.
NBC is Comcast!
..................
I find Gatestone to be refreshingly centrist. It encourages dialogue between the center-left, represented by people such as Senator Joe Lieberman and myself, and people from the center- right represented by speakers such as John Bolton and the eminent historian Victor Davis Hanson
They're also centrist in their coverage of terrorism. They report attacks on Jews, but they post a great deal on the slaughter of Christians. I've posted many of those articles here thru them and Frontpagemagazine. And the slaughter of Hindus, abuse of women. And the like. And also peaceful Muslims. Centrist. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/
Dershowitz has definitely turned some kind of corner.
I’ve noticed his maturation of intellectual integrity, similarly.
RE: Dershowitz has definitely turned some kind of corner
Yes, he has. But it is taken the level of virulence that the left displays when railing against Trump to make him turn that corner. He has been able to ignore much subtler signs for many years. It is only the brutality of the leftists and their attacks upon conservatives, most notably Trump, that has given him permission to wander off his normal Plantation. I am just saying, I’ll credit him for wandering off his Plantation, without giving them any awards for being able to read subtle signs.
I'm too young to remember the McCarthy era but I doubt his claim that "all decent people" were more upset by rhetoric which might have intimidated fellow travelers of that era than they were with what they knew of the horrors of Communism. During the same period we were fighting the Korean War. Stalin, Mao, and Kim Il Sung were our enemies.
First, they came for the Conservatives, and I did not speak out Because I was not a Conservative.
Then they came for the Libertarians, and I did not speak out Because I was not a Libertarian.
Then they came for the Christians, and I did not speak out Because I was not a Christian.
Then they came for meand there was no one left to speak for me.
I often disagree with Alan Dershowitz on matters of politics, but I respect him as an honorable man who loves freedom, respects the law, and reveres the truth. Dershowitz listens intently and speaks reasonably, and makes conversations interesting and informative. Excellent column.
“Dershowitz has definitely turned some kind of corner.`”
He’s a reptile. Maybe angling for a slot on Trump’s legal team. He’ll slip a a shive thru the ribs when the time is right.
Regarding muslim no-go zones: “a non-Jew apparently trying to discredit such rumors by wearing a kippah, was attacked on a Berlin street”
He would stand a better chance of survival by putting his head into the open mouth of a lion to show he’s just a harmless kitty cat.
Was it Dershowitz who represented, and got off, that European gigolo who killed his wealthy American wife about 25-30 years ago? I think she was from the NE area..NY state, Conn., Mass., R.I..
“Mainstream” journalists are no longer journalists.
They are propagandists.
Dershowitz did not leave the left. The left left Dershowitz. He has enough intellectual capacity and integrity that he was not pulled along when it totally b.....t.
So if I want to call someone a Commie Symp, I cant? Why the double standard, Alan?
Alan Dershowitz is a moral liberal and a believer in Constitutional law as written. Oddly he is on our side because he believes in The Constitution as written. I do not like his liberal beliefs but at the same time he is a strong defender of original interpretation of The Constitution. He is a good man.
When I was growing up (pre-cable), local news was one hour, national news was 30 minutes.
Now there are 3 24-hour news channels on cable. Is there more news then when I was young? No.
The cable news shows have to manufacture news in order to sell commercial time. They make up news for profit.
bookmark
I met him once, back in the 80s at Harvard.
When people say someone is "brilliant", it is an often overused term.
Dershowitz is brilliant. He was one of the most brilliant men I ever came across. He could speak in great detail about a myriad of topics, he knew facts upon facts, and he could shift gears mentally like a Ferrari.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.