Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Magnum44; Impy; fieldmarshaldj
>> I thought Connecticut voted for Gore in 2000 anyway. <<

True, but in 2004, Connecticut voted for Kerry, while Bush won the "popular vote" nationally.

Had this law been in effect at the time, the state would have been forced to award all its electoral votes to Bush, regardless of what "the people" of Connecticut wanted. It would have made the votes of their citizens meaningless.

Any chance we can retroactively apply this law? haha.

130 posted on 05/07/2018 10:35:00 AM PDT by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy; Magnum44; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; campaignPete R-CT; ...

The scheme only goes into effect if states representing 270 or more electoral votes join it.

So no, Bush wouldn’t have gotten the votes in 2004.

I don’t know if the scheme passes constitutional muster or not, it’s clever, but it’s no threat to pass in enough states, not currently anyway. If we let pig democrats take over enough states though...


156 posted on 05/07/2018 3:43:59 PM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson