Posted on 05/03/2018 11:04:21 AM PDT by Simon Green
Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell (Calif.) wrote an op-ed for USA Today calling for the government to ban and confiscate assault weapons across the United States.
In the article published Thursday, Swalwell argues that a measure similar to the 1994 federal assault weapons ban is not enough to combat gun violence, because it would only prevent new sales of assault weapons. He suggests the government should institute a buy-back program, which would take existing assault weapons out of possession. The congressman also advocates the prosecution of any individual who decides to keep their firearm.
"Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 would prohibit manufacture and sales, but it would not affect weapons already possessed," Swalwell writes. "This would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come."
"Instead," he continues, "we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons."
Swalwell notes that law enforcement officials and shooting clubs would be exempt.
Throughout his op-ed, Swalwell never defines what he considers a "military-style semiautomatic assault weapon." Instead, he classifies an assault weapon as a firearm that is capable of "spraying a crowd" with "lethal fire in seconds."
"An assault weapon, then, is a hand-held weapon of war, capable of spraying a crowd with more lethal fire in seconds," Swalwell writes.
"Assault weapon" is a political term that often refers to semi-automatic firearms with specific features and accessories.
Swalwell also discusses the February shooting at a high school in Parkland, Florida, admitting that he has used "moral equivalence" arguments regarding the Second Amendment.
"There's something new and different about the surviving Parkland high schoolers' demands," he writes. "They dismiss the moral equivalence we've made for far too long regarding the Second Amendment. I've been guilty of it myself, telling constituents and reporters that we can protect the Second Amendment and protect lives.'"
"The Parkland teens have taught us there is no right more important than every student's right to come home after class," Swalwell adds. "The right to live is supreme over any other."
Swalwell also touts Australia's gun buy-back program, noting his proposed U.S. program would be more expensive.
"Based on manufacturing figures and other indirect data, there could be 15 million assault weapons out there," he says. "If we offer $200 to buy back each weaponas many local governments havethen it would cost about $3 billion; at $1,000 each, the cost would be about $15 billion."
Swalwell says the price tag pales in comparison to the Republican tax reform law.
You can find the text free on the internet.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Try it.
Democrats can write??? Nah. I don’t believe it. I’ll bet it was ghost written by a Soros operative.
Ask this genius on camera to define a “non-assault” weapon.
I AGREE, but first I have 1 amendment:
This Law shall apply to ALL Persons. there shall be NO Exceptions, Exclusions, Preferences, Immunities, or Privileges afforded to ANY PERSON!!!
These people and the morons who vote for them don’t live on a different plant. They live in a different universe. Tax cuts don’t “cost” anything except in the Democrat universe where everything belongs to the government then allowing peasants to keep a bit more of the fruits of their labor IS a cost.
An armed populace is the only thing standing between us and a tyranny that Democrats would inflict that would make the old Soviet Union seem libertarian by comparison.
You cannot bargain with them. You cannot reason with them. Their position is that they want to enslave us. Ever inch given to them is a step toward tyranny. We gain nothing in compromise. “Every compromise between good and evil is a victory for evil”
Even worse is the jackasses that vote for them!
Go ahead and try, Demcritter.
That’s the day we HAVE them for. THAT day.
The “Government repair kit” is way to funny ! Gave me a good laugh.
I never thought of that! Too right mate!!
Parkland, Parkland, Parkland... the Democrat Thug Party stronghold where gross negligence by Democrat officials resulted in the massacre of many.
GTH, Swalwell.
The congressman also advocates the prosecution of any individual who decides to keep their firearm.
Prosecution = Persecution = Revolution.
Bring it you sniveling pukes, but will YOU be the
ones in the front line? You may not think so but may
find the front line comes to YOU.
Ditto
Ha. In “his community”. You bet bud.
This ass clown assumes that we’re all just going to hand them over. He also assumes that they’ll just SWAT the refuseniks.
He fails to understand that there are a significant number of people who will go full Keyser Sose on him, his family his business associates and political fellow travelers.
It will be worse than war, for there will be no limits to it.
He’d best make it a minimum 600 yard perimeter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.