Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1
Trump ought to just outright refuse to answer such "what were you thinking" questions. Any judge who says "you must answer" should be told that separation of powers is a thing and he has no right to compel the president to do anything other than follow the law, which he did. Stick to objective facts only.

It's time to draw a line in the sand and refute this idea that unelected judges are the ultimate power in this country. This could be the test case. A lot of Americans would agree with Trump that some random low level judge shouldn't have the power to force the President to come and justify all his actions to him.

4 posted on 05/03/2018 7:42:44 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Russians couldnt have done a better job destroying sacred American institutions than Democrats have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie

Let a judge try to order Trump around or hold him in contempt. Who is going to arrest Trump? The US Marshals who are under his command? The FBI who is under his command?

Obama had no problem protecting his subordinates from Congress or the courts by using his executive power. The least Trump can do is protect himself.


10 posted on 05/03/2018 7:51:56 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie

Its not a question of separation of powers. The DOaj is part of the executive branch. President Trump is the head of the executive branch and the one the Constitution States is responsible for enforcing the law. Mueller should be told he is to list out the crime and, in writing, explain why he needs input from POTUS.

Mueller and his merry band of thieves are getting fat on the taxpayer dime. They have NO incentive to bring this to a conclusion


19 posted on 05/03/2018 8:36:43 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie
"what were you thinking"

You know, that was a long time ago and I did not take notes. So I cannot possibly accurately recall my thoughts nor would I care to speculate for fear of being inaccurate. Next question.
23 posted on 05/03/2018 8:55:55 AM PDT by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie

Trump should order the Marshal’s Service to yank their deputies from courts that make unconstitutional rulings.


27 posted on 05/03/2018 9:21:54 AM PDT by chesley (What is life but a long dialog with imbeciles? - Pierre Ryckmans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie

“What were you thinking” is to establish intent.

Remember, under Comey law, if the suspect doesn’t INTEND to break the law, by whatever criteria they use to establish that, then there is no crime.


28 posted on 05/03/2018 9:42:10 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson