Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I could see two paths being able to financially make it and turn a profit. New York to Washington. New York to Chicago. Beyond them, there’s zero chance that any of these will ever pay back what it costs to build and run it.


4 posted on 04/30/2018 10:11:43 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

I did the math elsewhere....if you ditched the rail project and the State of California gave a 100% subsidy on round-trip airfare from SAN Fran to LAX it would STILL be cheaper.


10 posted on 04/30/2018 10:18:58 AM PDT by DoodleBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice

“New York to Chicago”

Why would anyone take a “high speed” train that would take 3-6 times longer than flying, and cost more (unless heavily subsidized)? It would certainly never be enough people to make a profit.


37 posted on 04/30/2018 5:02:03 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson