Skip to comments.
One Man’s Ideas For ‘Gun Control That Works’
The Truth About Guns ^
| 04/28/18
| Dan Zimmerman
Posted on 04/28/2018 12:11:13 PM PDT by Simon Green
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: Simon Green
Merely preliminary “common sense” steps towards the desired “common sense” confiscation.
2
posted on
04/28/2018 12:15:18 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Simon Green
Hell no.
“Give them nothing, but take from them, everything.”
-Leonidas
~W
3
posted on
04/28/2018 12:15:19 PM PDT
by
wheresmyusa
(A knight without armor in a savage land...)
To: Simon Green
“Combine these two concepts with a thorough but reasonable vetting process...”
Interesting how he goes into a detailed description of what semi-auto and possession means. But no clue on what “thorough and reasonable” is.
4
posted on
04/28/2018 12:15:30 PM PDT
by
21twelve
To: Simon Green
How about we just don’t infringe?
To: Simon Green
Moronic idea worthy of Chuck Schumer. You don’t need a license to exercise a right. If you need a license it isn’t a right. It’s a privilege. And privileges can be revoked at any time for any reason or no reason at all. This dude can go suck on a cholla branch.
6
posted on
04/28/2018 12:17:39 PM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: Simon Green
Gun control that “works” to do what? You need a federal license to exercise a Constitutional right? I’m sorry, but no sale.
To: Simon Green
>>Oh, and about the requirement for that federal license . . .
>>Yeah, were going to fight over that. A lot, probably. But that fight would be way more reality-centered and sane than our current fights over pistol grips and barrel shrouds and telescoping stocks.
Let’s just called everyone who currently owns a semi-auto a DREAMER and give them a free license, no questions asked,....and throw in a new AR-15 and 10,000 rds of ammo too..because, ya know, DREAMER!
8
posted on
04/28/2018 12:20:33 PM PDT
by
Bryanw92
(Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
To: Simon Green
But then of course if you don’t want to comply such as Chicago gangs how do words written down on paper make people physically comply? Talk to women who’ve survived attacks by their ex bf/husbands under a court order to stay away from them; words are just words.
9
posted on
04/28/2018 12:20:35 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: Simon Green
The second amendment is a preexistence right. Lets license politicians and criminals first and see if that works.
10
posted on
04/28/2018 12:21:13 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: Simon Green
I have a proposal for you, John.
How about you f*ck off and die.
11
posted on
04/28/2018 12:25:06 PM PDT
by
chris37
("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
To: Simon Green
All this is predicated on the belief that gun control advocates aren’t liars who’ll backstab and confiscate/ban guns or otherwise misuse or break the law.
12
posted on
04/28/2018 12:25:39 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
(So far so good.)
To: Billthedrill
Gun control that works to do what? You need a federal license to exercise a Constitutional right? Im sorry, but no sale.
Besides, those who have a CHL are not required to go through a background check anyway.
13
posted on
04/28/2018 12:28:29 PM PDT
by
snoringbear
(W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
To: Simon Green
The Second Amendment ain't "broken". Don't try to "fix" it!
14
posted on
04/28/2018 12:29:02 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias; "0bama": Allah's stooge; "Moderate Muslims": Allah's useful idiots.)
To: Simon Green
Jon Stokes’ gun control idea has all the value of used toilet paper.
To: Simon Green
Oh, I see. Just following the way the 2nd amendment is written. It’s a sub paragraph located right next to where it says abortion on demand is a right. My take-——uh, NO!
16
posted on
04/28/2018 12:29:22 PM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Simon Green; All
--this very similar to what was proposed in an article in
Playboy about thirty years ago---
--see-I did read the articles---
17
posted on
04/28/2018 12:29:32 PM PDT
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: Simon Green
To: Simon Green
Sounds like one of the worst ideas I have ever heard. Where does fundamental right fit in. It doesnt.
To: Simon Green
Full licensing = registration = confiscation.
Anti-gun nuts won't be able to stand knowing where all the guns are and not confiscating them. It's as inevitable as night follows day. They won't let any law or Constitution stand in their way, either.
20
posted on
04/28/2018 12:31:41 PM PDT
by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson