[Garth Tater]

A property owner has the right to decide who may access their property and under what conditions they may do so. Your rights include not patronizing that business if you choose not to disarm - but you don’t have the right to trespass on their property.

[Gator113]

I know the law and how it works. If I were asked to leave because they know I am carrying (not likely) , I’ll smile and leave.

[Freedom4US]

That holds true for private property. Restaurants and such, however, are places of "public accomodation". Remember?

We were all forced to accept this asinine notion, when it came to smoking and/or tobacco use. Therefore I see no reason for anyone to suddenly reverse course and now try to claim private property rights with respect to concealed carry. F 'em.

[Kozak]

Tell that to the bakers forced to make gay cakes.

[Manly Warrior]

Agreed in principle. However, being given license to enter on the premise that I disarm is immoral and unacceptable, espc. if they then do not post armed security.

One reason why I love being a MO resident- CCW permit overrides such postings and provides for remedy if my concealed weapon is found out. I can leave. If I refuse, and a peace officer is called, I can be ticketed. Citation.

Now, a non-permitted person exercising constitutional carry is subject to felony charges.....

[buffaloguy]

And you have the right of having your company sued for not providing adequate security for your customers. Goes both ways.

[ontap]

There is room for discussion here but my opinion is my 2nd ammendment rights supersede his property rights. The days of business owners having complete control of their establishments were ended when the courts ruled they could not refuse service to anyone if it violated their constitutional rights !!!