He ended that testimony with “otherwise connected to it.” Not her, it. Meaning otherwise connected to the campaign.
His recusal letter makes that clear and it is the letter that is the controlling factor, not his testimony. The letter is very closely aligned with his testimony.
Your scenario depends on Sessions being a brilliant word parser who slyly suggested he would recuse himself from anything connected to Hillary but who actually meant he would investigate certain aspects of her malfeasance that he could argue were not technically included in his recusal.
It’s going on 15 mos. When was the no-knock raid on Hillary’s house? Where, indeed, is one actual scintilla of evidence that Hillary is being investigated?
If lived through the ‘secret arrests/where is Podests,’ lunacy. Apart from wishful thinking, what is the actual evidence?
[Note: any reference to 4DChess will be taken as an inappropriate foray into comedy.]
You left off the first part of the sentence including the word "or". It's her "or" it.
His recusal letter makes that clear and it is the letter that is the controlling factor, not his testimony. The letter is very closely aligned with his testimony.
His recusal letter is similar to what he said during the confirmation hearing under oath.
Confirmation hearing:
Written statement:
And of course all DOJ actions since, on the email investigation, the Clinton Foundation, Uranium One, the dossier and the FISA warrant have been handled not by the recused Sessions but instead by the compromised Rod Rosenstein.