Your scenario depends on Sessions being a brilliant word parser who slyly suggested he would recuse himself from anything connected to Hillary but who actually meant he would investigate certain aspects of her malfeasance that he could argue were not technically included in his recusal.
It’s going on 15 mos. When was the no-knock raid on Hillary’s house? Where, indeed, is one actual scintilla of evidence that Hillary is being investigated?
If lived through the ‘secret arrests/where is Podests,’ lunacy. Apart from wishful thinking, what is the actual evidence?
[Note: any reference to 4DChess will be taken as an inappropriate foray into comedy.]
No, my scenario relies on the recusal letter that says he studied the matter and consulted with experts, then decided on his recusal.
BTW, I am not pro-Sessions. I am pro-truth.
There’s never going to be a raid on Hillary’s house. She’s a first lady, wife of a former President, and it doesn’t matter who the AG is, another president, even Trump, is never going to allow it because they will protect the office of the presidency at the expense of justice *every single time.*
You are setting yourself up for disappointment by even entertaining the thought perhaps because we all enjoy the thought very much and cheered when Trump made the jail comment in the debate.
But it was always hoped for unicorn sightings.
Comey and his coven made certain of that by giving plea deals to all the right conspirators/witnesses, and by giving them time to destroy everything, so that getting a successful prosecution on what remains untainted would be incredibly difficult an will take years and years, even if it wasn’t politically charged. It’s not a simple white collar crime case, more like a mafia conspiracy case, the mother of all mafia cases made far more complicated by the involvement of a UK official and one of their spooks, and the importance of our “special relationship.” Add an Australian official. International eavesdropping. This is why this isn’t going to end soon, tied up in a neat package, no matter who the AG is. It’s not just a mafia case, it’s also a diplomatic and espionage case.
And that’s not even touching the Russian and Ukrainian end of the turd, or the Iran and Uranium mess... or the Awan mess which involves diplomacy in Pakistan and Hezbollah... a fumble in any one of these cases will impact the others because they are interconnected.
This is not a simple bank robbery.
Even worse it involves yet another President, Obama.
For darn sure Trump will never go after Obama even if Obama openly bragged about his involvement. It’ll never happen, even if your fantasy pick for AG, whoever he is, had the job, because Trump won’t go that far, especially in his 1st term.
You’ll have to settle for smaller fish and due to the complexity, and a long wait for anyone meaty to end up on the hook. Some people definitely need to go to jail to turn the cancer around... but I wouldn’t expect it to be Hillary, because it would be unprecedented, she’s arguably insane and nature will likely get her first, and Trump has other fish to fry, even Sessions does.
Other crime and terrorist plots didn’t just pause while the Democrats ran their coup campaign.
Like maybe finishing the unsolved USS Cole investigation, etc. The FBI hasn’t even solved that one yet. Even the anthrax case is still mostly unexplained along with some ricin mailings against the Bush White House are unsolved [as far as the public’s ben told] .